Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: SATSCAMS EMAIL... wrong info on it...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    1
    Satfix Buxs
    22
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default SATSCAMS EMAIL... wrong info on it...

    New account... old member.

    I received received an email about a Nagrastar settlement. The name on top as correct, but the physical address was an old work address so nothing was received by CMRRR. Also, the "evidence" listed only 1 item and the date and transaction ID don't matchup with anything. If I go back 4 yeasr I can find a match for the amount which "could" be related. The date on the listed evidence is over 3 years old.

    I've read through pages and pages of info but not sure how to proceed consider the info isn't correct.

    Should I contact them to see if they have more evidence? Should I wait since the evidence is possibly not correct?

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to notaniksuser For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    507
    Satfix Buxs
    5,369
    Thanks
    381
    Thanked 430 Times in 219 Posts

    Default

    Well there is no right answer other than to speak to a lawyer. My layman opinion since you receive the letter by email and not by registered mail I would not reply to it nor contact them. If you contact them the first question they could ask would be for the current address. Also if you call block out you phone number as if they get it than they can reverse it.


    You should check in your state if email is an acceptable valid notice. Most likely it is not but if you reply to the email you would be than be putting yourself in a position of confirming you receive it and read it which might than apply as being valid.


    I don't normally advise ignoring notices but for notices by email I would ignore it but I am not a lawyer.




    GS2

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gunsmoke2 - GS2 For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    79
    Satfix Buxs
    587
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 67 Times in 33 Posts

    Default

    There really is no way for a sender to be 100 percent sure that a recipient has received an email.

    I suspect that the email you received is an offer by DN to settle a controversy before they take you to court. If that's what the email is all about it is simply an informal curtesy communication. DN is under no obligation to keep that settlement offer open. So if they decide to track down your whereabouts and formally serve you the amount to settle will go up.

    If you decide to respond you should let an attorney respond on your behalf.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to MarvinGardens For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    5,686
    Satfix Buxs
    51,053
    Thanks
    1,149
    Thanked 6,951 Times in 3,275 Posts
    Items Beef
Gift received at 01-24-2014, 03:26 PM from swanner
Message: Thanks for Your Input, with all the Hot Heads around.. Should be cooked in No Time..LOLDish
Gift received at 12-15-2013, 08:10 PM from holly2012
Message: From an Old FriendDog
Gift received at 10-30-2013, 12:15 AM from Just_angel
Message: love chloe xoxoxWhiskey
Gift received at 03-27-2013, 03:33 PM from thebeav
Message: found this behind the dumpster at the casino when i was looking for W H :)Heart
Gift received at 11-20-2012, 11:22 AM from Just_angel
Message: x0x0A Beer
Gift received at 11-06-2012, 02:58 AM from Styx_N_Stones
Message: I seem to have accumulated too many beers... LOL!Crown Royal
Gift received at 10-11-2012, 03:49 PM from Just_angelbeer
Gift received at 10-10-2012, 05:14 PM from JCO
Message: Now I need to find some oxi's and add them to the store..LOL

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarvinGardens View Post
    There really is no way for a sender to be 100 percent sure that a recipient has received an email.

    I suspect that the email you received is an offer by DN to settle a controversy before they take you to court. If that's what the email is all about it is simply an informal curtesy communication. DN is under no obligation to keep that settlement offer open. So if they decide to track down your whereabouts and formally serve you the amount to settle will go up.

    If you decide to respond you should let an attorney respond on your behalf.
    I thought it was a 3 year time limit?

    DODGE the father

    RAM the daughter



    “Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut.”

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to dishuser For This Useful Post:


  9. #5
    c8rbk1ng's Avatar
    c8rbk1ng is offline VIP, Satfix 2014 NFL Pool Week #5 & week # 15 Champion
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    7,750
    Satfix Buxs
    16,541
    Thanks
    1,733
    Thanked 4,040 Times in 1,122 Posts
    Items Crab
Gift received at 08-08-2015, 07:53 PM from gAsH
Message: I tried 15x in a row with different people and lost every time! :lol: 

Here is a gift for the crabby old man :tehe: You spelled your name wrong, should be Cr8bk1ng :PWireless AccessPopcornGuitar2JeepCamaroFootball

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dishuser View Post
    I thought it was a 3 year time limit?
    Different statute of limitations in different states, need to look it up on a per state basis. If he responds, that's considered a communication and the time limit will start all over.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to c8rbk1ng For This Useful Post:


  11. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    79
    Satfix Buxs
    587
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 67 Times in 33 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dishuser View Post
    I thought it was a 3 year time limit?
    The time limit begins to run when DN discovers evidence leading to the identity the IKS subscriber.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to MarvinGardens For This Useful Post:


  13. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    79
    Satfix Buxs
    587
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 67 Times in 33 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by c8rbk1ng View Post
    Different statute of limitations in different states, need to look it up on a per state basis. If he responds, that's considered a communication and the time limit will start all over.
    Incorrect. The DMCA is federal law and cases will be litigated in federal court. State law does not apply.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to MarvinGardens For This Useful Post:


  15. #8
    c8rbk1ng's Avatar
    c8rbk1ng is offline VIP, Satfix 2014 NFL Pool Week #5 & week # 15 Champion
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    7,750
    Satfix Buxs
    16,541
    Thanks
    1,733
    Thanked 4,040 Times in 1,122 Posts
    Items Crab
Gift received at 08-08-2015, 07:53 PM from gAsH
Message: I tried 15x in a row with different people and lost every time! :lol: 

Here is a gift for the crabby old man :tehe: You spelled your name wrong, should be Cr8bk1ng :PWireless AccessPopcornGuitar2JeepCamaroFootball

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarvinGardens View Post
    Incorrect. The DMCA is federal law and cases will be litigated in federal court. State law does not apply.
    Maybe your conception but I actually went through this and was not in Federal Court but State Court...maybe that's why I won

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to c8rbk1ng For This Useful Post:


  17. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    79
    Satfix Buxs
    587
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 67 Times in 33 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by c8rbk1ng View Post
    Maybe your conception but I actually went through this and was not in Federal Court but State Court...maybe that's why I won
    LOL. It's not my conception.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to MarvinGardens For This Useful Post:


  19. #10
    c8rbk1ng's Avatar
    c8rbk1ng is offline VIP, Satfix 2014 NFL Pool Week #5 & week # 15 Champion
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    7,750
    Satfix Buxs
    16,541
    Thanks
    1,733
    Thanked 4,040 Times in 1,122 Posts
    Items Crab
Gift received at 08-08-2015, 07:53 PM from gAsH
Message: I tried 15x in a row with different people and lost every time! :lol: 

Here is a gift for the crabby old man :tehe: You spelled your name wrong, should be Cr8bk1ng :PWireless AccessPopcornGuitar2JeepCamaroFootball

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarvinGardens View Post
    LOL. It's not my conception.
    Glad you "got" the intended joke

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to c8rbk1ng For This Useful Post:


  21. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    139
    Satfix Buxs
    1,305
    Thanks
    5,491
    Thanked 86 Times in 52 Posts

    Default

    I have some new information on the demand letters. Seems like once a reseller is busted and has his records seized then basically anyone who bought from him will also receive letters..
    The thing is that i have see with my own eyes a person who received the same satscams email showing the correct transactions..but the transactions had nothing to do with rocket or nfps (this person never purchased iks from the reseller) but with iptv from ipguys.... and the email only mentions nfps and rocket iks.....so basically many times they must be fishing...

  22. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mechanicman For This Useful Post:


  23. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    507
    Satfix Buxs
    5,369
    Thanks
    381
    Thanked 430 Times in 219 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mechanicman View Post
    I have some new information on the demand letters. Seems like once a reseller is busted and has his records seized then basically anyone who bought from him will also receive letters..
    The thing is that i have see with my own eyes a person who received the same satscams email showing the correct transactions..but the transactions had nothing to do with rocket or nfps (this person never purchased iks from the reseller) but with iptv from ipguys.... and the email only mentions nfps and rocket iks.....so basically many times they must be fishing...



    I don't think that is new information. In fact that concept first stated with Dave quite some time ago around 2002. They received end user information from either law enforcement busts of dealers or from Civil lawsuits of dealers. They sent out about 10,000 end user demand letters and than filled lawsuit against ones who did not settle.


    However back than some end users won their cases while most lost. in those lawsuits it was about devices you bought. Some were able to argue that the devices bought had some legal uses plus a Court ruled that Dave has no civil right of action against those who simply possess pirate devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2512. That only applied to 18 U.S.C. § 2512 not allegations of other violations pertaining to other laws like the DMCA. I don't think they allege infractions of 18 U.S.C. § 2512 anymore.


    With obtaining codes for IKS you really don't have any legal argument of obtaining them for some legal use.



    GS2

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Gunsmoke2 - GS2 For This Useful Post:


  25. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    949
    Satfix Buxs
    14,126
    Thanks
    3,949
    Thanked 2,921 Times in 819 Posts

    Default

    I have a fishing trip lined up for next month but won't be going because the fish have learned not to bite.

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Benney For This Useful Post:


  27. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    165
    Satfix Buxs
    20,279
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 260 Times in 98 Posts
    Items Immunity to TheftCamaro
Gift received at 07-13-2015, 04:02 PM from nob0dyBox of crap
Gift received at 07-13-2015, 04:02 PM from nob0dyCrown Royal
Gift received at 06-30-2015, 05:08 PM from nob0dy
Message: have a drink on me ;DHookah
Gift received at 06-30-2015, 05:08 PM from nob0dyACDC
Gift received at 06-30-2015, 05:08 PM from nob0dyWhiskey
Gift received at 05-02-2015, 08:22 PM from nob0dy

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Benney View Post
    I have a fishing trip lined up for next month but won't be going because the fish have learned not to bite.
    Remember the OP is "notaniksuser" lol

    Perhaps you're using the wrong bait? Have you tried rats? They seem to work sometimes, however it's more than a fish can get in it's mouth.
    Last edited by Dells; 03-17-2017 at 02:03 PM.

  28. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dells For This Useful Post:


  29. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    7
    Satfix Buxs
    211
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Any update on your situation?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •