I’m interested purchasing for testing prefer 622
I appreciate the support
I’m interested purchasing for testing prefer 622
I appreciate the support
I just like playing around looking for vip 622 with tplink to upgrade the bev service
vip622 same as bell 9242 they just use difference case same hardware.
no change in tplink eco-client .
only difference 622 receiver only difference bev tier list
for it to work, more then just tiers would be needed
you would need to re flash it with bev firmware and have the matching cam image I think
i would agree with that statement
fireshare
CPU Usage: 0%
Resident Memory Usage: 0Kb
Virtual Memory Usage: 0Kb
Global system FDs [Current/Max]: 0/0
Active Webif Users:
e c h o - c l i e n t
home | configuration | console logs
:: configuration ::
GENERAL CONFIGURATION
Debug Level:
Execute in Background:
Log to Console:
Log to Web Interface:
Log to File:
Log File Path:
Serial Port:
Byte Write Delay: microsecond(s)
Systemwide Time Offset: hour(s)
Nagra Generation:
Autoupdate Expired Items: day(s)
CAM Timezone [GMT]: hour(s)
CAM Status Request Delay: millisecond(s)
Control Words Timeout: second(s)
Retries Before Failover:
Failure on Blank CWs:
Block ECMs:
Constant Server Connections:
TIER SOURCES CONFIGURATION
Tier Source:
Upload CAM Image:
CAM Image Path:
Custom Tiers:
Last edited by karunale; 11-27-2017 at 11:58 PM.
The updates are still in the stream for vip's bro...if you don't have the eep/tsop locked, your receiver will take updated firmware making it unusable for iks.I know first hand of a guy that put a virgin 211 into service this past month:ird took the firmware & rendered it useless.This is DN I'm refering to though.I can't say for Bev.
9242 is at v342 & grandma says all is well.