zombola
02-10-2015, 12:57 PM
(Reuters) - Same-sex couples began marrying in Alabama on Monday, defying an attempt by the chief justice of the state's Supreme Court to block probate judges from issuing marriages licenses to gays and lesbians.
A ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday helped clear the way for Alabama to become the 37th state to allow same-sex couples to marry. Justices refused a request by Alabama's attorney general to keep such marriages on hold until the court rules whether laws banning them are constitutional.
"We wanted to be part of history," said Dee Bush, 40, who received one of the first marriage licenses issued to same-sex couples in Birmingham, Alabama. She and her partner of seven years, Laura Bush, quickly wed in a park outside the courthouse.
Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore had sought to throw up a last-minute roadblock for marriages between gay and lesbian couples.
Late Sunday, the socially conservative justice issued an order directing probate judges in his state not to hand out marriage licenses to people of the same sex. He said judges were not bound by a federal ruling that last month struck down Alabama's ban on same-sex marriages.
U.S. District Court Judge Callie Granade, an appointee of President George W. Bush, ruled in January that Alabama's prohibition on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional but put her decision on hold until Monday.
Two of the U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia, dissented from the court’s decision not to further delay gay marriage in Alabama.
In a dissenting opinion, Thomas hinted that the court’s actions in allowing marriages to go ahead “may well be seen as a signal of the court’s intended resolution of that question.”
In April, the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in cases concerning marriage restrictions in Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee. A ruling due by the end of June will determine if 13 state bans will remain intact.
There has already been a legal sea change, thanks in large part to the U.S. Supreme Court. It began in June 2013 when the court struck down a federal law that restricted, for the purpose of federal benefits, the definition of marriage to heterosexual couples.
Judges around the country later seized on the language in the high court decision, written by swing vote Justice Anthony Kennedy, to strike down a series of state bans.
At the time of the 2013 ruling, only 12 states had authorized gay marriage.
(By Sherrel Wheeler Stewart; Additional reporting by Lawrence Hurley in Washington; Writing by Colleen Jenkins; Editing by Doina Chiacu)
A ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday helped clear the way for Alabama to become the 37th state to allow same-sex couples to marry. Justices refused a request by Alabama's attorney general to keep such marriages on hold until the court rules whether laws banning them are constitutional.
"We wanted to be part of history," said Dee Bush, 40, who received one of the first marriage licenses issued to same-sex couples in Birmingham, Alabama. She and her partner of seven years, Laura Bush, quickly wed in a park outside the courthouse.
Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore had sought to throw up a last-minute roadblock for marriages between gay and lesbian couples.
Late Sunday, the socially conservative justice issued an order directing probate judges in his state not to hand out marriage licenses to people of the same sex. He said judges were not bound by a federal ruling that last month struck down Alabama's ban on same-sex marriages.
U.S. District Court Judge Callie Granade, an appointee of President George W. Bush, ruled in January that Alabama's prohibition on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional but put her decision on hold until Monday.
Two of the U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia, dissented from the court’s decision not to further delay gay marriage in Alabama.
In a dissenting opinion, Thomas hinted that the court’s actions in allowing marriages to go ahead “may well be seen as a signal of the court’s intended resolution of that question.”
In April, the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in cases concerning marriage restrictions in Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee. A ruling due by the end of June will determine if 13 state bans will remain intact.
There has already been a legal sea change, thanks in large part to the U.S. Supreme Court. It began in June 2013 when the court struck down a federal law that restricted, for the purpose of federal benefits, the definition of marriage to heterosexual couples.
Judges around the country later seized on the language in the high court decision, written by swing vote Justice Anthony Kennedy, to strike down a series of state bans.
At the time of the 2013 ruling, only 12 states had authorized gay marriage.
(By Sherrel Wheeler Stewart; Additional reporting by Lawrence Hurley in Washington; Writing by Colleen Jenkins; Editing by Doina Chiacu)