Log in

View Full Version : Leaked video reveals chaos of Baghdad attack



dan9999
04-07-2010, 03:16 PM
Leaked video reveals chaos of Baghdad attack
By Tom Cohen, CNN
April 7, 2010 10:03 a.m. EDT

(CNN) -- The soldiers of Bravo Company 2-16 Infantry had been under fire all morning from rocket-propelled grenades and small arms on the first day of Operation Ilaaj in Baghdad.

Two Apache attack helicopters, code-named Crazyhorse 18 and 19, headed out to help the ground troops clear insurgents from an area of the New Baghdad district of the Iraqi capital.

Forty minutes later, nine people in the street were dead, including a photographer and driver for the news agency Reuters. Two Iraqi children were injured, while U.S. forces suffered no casualties.

The engagement on July 12, 2007, gained international attention because of the deaths of the Reuters journalists.

Now, aerial footage from one of the helicopters made public by the Web site WikiLeaks has led to new revelations about exactly what happened in the sweltering heat that morning.

WikiLeaks, which publishes anonymously submitted documents, video and other sensitive materials, posted the aerial footage Monday.

The video footage showed that one of two photojournalists killed was being rescued when the gunship's crew fired on the van to which he was being carried. Saying the footage was still classified, Wikileaks contended it "clearly shows the unprovoked slaying of a wounded Reuters employee and his rescuers."

On Tuesday, the Pentagon made public a partially redacted report on the incident that concluded the Apache attackers had no way of knowing the journalists were among suspected insurgents on the street.

"It must be noted that details which are readily apparent when viewed on a large video monitor are not necessarily apparent to the Apache pilots during a live-fire engagement," the report said, adding that the pilots viewed the scene on a much smaller screen while trying to fly safely and look for enemy insurgents.

From that perspective, the journalists' cameras looked like weapons carried by the suspected insurgents, including rocket-propelled grenades and assault rifles, according to the report. In addition, the journalists lacked any distinctive clothing or markings to distinguish themselves from the combatants, the report said.

In a statement posted on the Reuters Web site Tuesday, the agency's editor-in-chief, David Schlesinger, called the footage "difficult and disturbing to watch, but also important to watch."

"I will continue to campaign for better training for the military -- to help as much as possible to teach the difference in form between a camera and an RPG or between a tripod and a weapon," Schlesinger's statement said.

The two photojournalists were Saeed Chmagh and Namir Noor-Eldeen. In the video footage, both can be seen carrying photo equipment as they walked in the streets of New Baghdad on the morning of the incident.

From the limited view of an aerial camera mounted on a helicopter gunship, the scene appears relatively calm. The journalists walk in the middle of the road amid a group of men, seemingly unconcerned about potential imminent danger.

To the military, the group of "military-aged men" represented a threat that required engagement.

Retired Army Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt told CNN on Tuesday the incident occurred at the height of the insurgency on a morning when fighting had occurred for four hours.

According to the investigation report dated July 17, 2007, five days after the incident, two in the group of men carried cameras with long lenses while some others had weapons including rocket-propelled grenades and automatic rifles.

"The cameras could easily be mistaken for slung AK-47 or AKM rifles, especially since neither cameraman is wearing anything that identifies him as media or press," the report says.

In the Apaches, the aerial attackers notified each other of weapons being carried by the group in the street.

"That's a weapon," says one voice on the transcript of the video. A few seconds later, a voice in Crazy Horse 18 confirms: "Have individuals with weapons."

"Yup, he's got a weapon, too," says the next recorded voice a few seconds later.

The helicopters get ready to attack, with a request to engage, or shoot, "five to six individuals with AK-47" rifles.

"Roger that. Uh, we have no personnel east of our positions. So, uh, you are free to engage. Over," comes the reply.

However, the men on the street have moved toward a building that blocks them from the view of the aerial camera, prompting the following comments on the helicopters' transcript:

"I can't get 'em now because they're behind that building," one voice says. Seconds later, another says one of the men on the street has a rocket-propelled grenade.

Again, the building obscures the view from the helicopters. The frustration becomes evident in the voices on the transcript.

"Yeah, we had a guy shoot -- and now he's behind the building," one voice says, while another curses.

"Just [expletive], once you get on 'em, just open 'em up," says one voice.

Seconds later, that is exactly what happens.

"You're clear," a voice says, followed by another that says, "All right, firing."

Multiple voices ensue, with calls of "Let's shoot," "Light 'em all up," and "Come on, fire."

A few seconds later, a voice says: "All right, we just engaged all eight individuals." In the ensuing exchange of information, one voice says: "All right, hahaha, I hit 'em."

On the ground, the group had gathered on the side of the road with little visible awareness of what was about to happen.

They are instantly cut down by the strafing from the Apache gunship's 30 mm machine gun and enveloped in a cloud of smoke and dust.

Asked by CNN why the men in the street appeared unprepared for the attack, Kimmitt noted the helicopter could have been as far as 800 meters away and might have looked to be circling the general area rather than focusing on them.

"What you're looking at is a screen under high magnification," Kimmitt said. "So it's very clear that had they seen helicopters aiming at them, they probably would have taken some different action. But our technology is such that we can do this from quite a distance away."

One of the journalists, Noor-Eldeen, appears in the video footage to have been killed in the first round of strafing. It shows that Chmagh surviving the initial shooting, but apparently he died when the gunship opened fire on people attempting to get him to a van that arrived, apparently to collect the wounded.

"We have individuals going to the scene, looks like possibly, uh, picking up bodies and weapons," says a voice on the transcript a few minutes after the initial shooting.

Repeated requests to open fire get no response, and voice can be heard saying: "Come on, let us shoot."

The order to engage, or start shooting, comes shortly thereafter. About 90 seconds later, a voice says: "No more shooting."

In the following minutes, ground soldiers on the scene find two wounded Iraqi children at the scene. The investigation report describes one of the children as a young girl in the van, who suffered a stomach injury.

"This tragic incident was investigated at that time by the brigade involved, and the investigation found that the forces involved were not aware of the presence of the two reporters, and that all evidence available supported the conclusion by those forces that they were engaging armed insurgents, and not civilians," Maj. Shawn Turner, a U.S. military spokesman, told CNN in a written statement Monday.

Turner rejected any insinuation that the U.S. Army tried to cover up the manner in which the journalists were killed, saying: "We regret the loss of innocent life, but this incident was promptly investigated, and there was never any attempt to cover up any aspects of this engagement."

The U.S. command in Iraq said the video was "presumably associated" with the raid that led to the two journalists' deaths, but said it was still working to verify the authenticity of the footage.

A total of 139 journalists, nearly 120 of them Iraqis, have been killed during the 7-year-old war, according to the New York-based Committee To Protect Journalists. At least 16 of those were killed by U.S. fire, and the committee said the video released Monday "raises questions about the actions of U.S. military forces and the thoroughness and transparency of the investigation that followed."

"This footage is deeply disturbing and reminds us of what journalists in war zones undergo to bring us the news," Joel Simon, the group's executive director, said in a written statement. "The video also confirms our long-held view that a thorough and transparent investigation into this incident is urgently needed."

Reuters' Schlesinger said the video footage, while difficult to watch, showed the extreme difficulties and threats that face journalists in conflict zones.

"There is no better evidence of the dangers each and every journalist in a war zone faces at any time," Schlesinger's statement said.

Along with his promised push for journalists' safety, Schlesinger said he also would "continue to press for thorough and objective investigations," and that he and Thomson Reuters Chief Executive Officer Tom Glocer would seek a meeting with Pentagon officials to "press the need to learn lessons from this tragedy."

"What matters in the end is not how we as colleagues and friends feel; what matters is the wider public debate that our stories and this video provoke," his statement said.

CNN's Adam Levine and Barbara Starr contributed to this report.

---

The video can be seen here...
hxxp://www.wikileaks.com/

dan9999
04-07-2010, 03:17 PM
Due to the sensitive nature of this post, I will close this thread...
Thks.

dan9999
04-07-2010, 03:27 PM
April 07, 2010
By Justin Fishel
FOXNews.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- WikiLeaks, the self-proclaimed "whistle-blowing" investigative Web site, released a classified military video Monday that it says shows the "indiscriminate slaying" of innocent Iraqis. Two days later, questions linger about just how much of the story WikiLeaks decided to tell.

At a press conference in Washington, D.C., WikiLeaks accused U.S. soldiers of killing 25 civilians, including two Reuters journalists, during a July 12, 2007, attack in New Baghdad. The Web site titled the video "Collateral Murder," and said the killings represented "another day at the office" for the U.S. Army.

The military has always maintained the attacks near Baghdad were justified, saying investigations conducted after the incident showed 11 people were killed during a "continuation of hostile activity." The military also admits two misidentified Reuters cameramen were among the dead.

WikiLeaks said on Monday the video taken from an Army helicopter shows the men were walking through a courtyard and did nothing to provoke the attack. Their representatives said when the military mistook cameras for weapons, U.S. personnel killed everyone in sight and have attempted to cover up the murders ever since.

The problem, according to many who have viewed the video, is that WikiLeaks appears to have done selective editing that tells only half the story. For instance, the Web site takes special care to slow down the video and identify the two photographers and the cameras they are carrying.

However, the Web site does not slow down the video to show that at least one man in that group was carrying a rocket-propelled grenade launcher, a clearly visible weapon that runs nearly two-thirds the length of his body.

WikiLeaks also does not point out that at least one man was carrying an AK-47 assault rifle. He is seen swinging the weapon below his waist while standing next to the man holding the RPG.

"It gives you a limited perspective," said Capt. Jack Hanzlik, a spokesman for U.S. Central Command. "The video only tells you a portion of the activity that was happening that day. Just from watching that video, people cannot understand the complex battles that occurred. You are seeing only a very narrow picture of the events."

Hanzlik said images gathered during a military investigation of the incident show multiple weapons around the dead bodies in the courtyard, including at least three RPGs.

"Our forces were engaged in combat all that day with individuals that fit the description of the men in that video. Their age, their weapons, and the fact that they were within the distance of the forces that had been engaged made it apparent these guys were potentially a threat," Hanzlik said.

Military officials have also pointed out that the men in the video are the only people visible on those streets. That indicated something was going on and that these individuals still felt they could walk freely, one official told Fox News.

Julian Assange, a WikiLeaks editor, acknowledged to Fox News in an interview Tuesday evening that "it's likely some of the individuals seen in the video were carrying weapons."

Assange said his suspicions about the weapons were so strong that a draft version of the video they produced made specific reference to the AK-47s and RPGs. Ultimately, Assange said, WikiLeaks became "unsure" about the weapons. He claimed the RPG could have been a camera tripod, so editors decided not to point it out.

"Based upon visual evidence I suspect there probably were AKs and an RPG, but I'm not sure that means anything," Assange said. Nearly every Iraqi household has a rifle or an AK. Those guys could have just been protecting their area."

The military has said Army units on the ground were experiencing RPG fire before calling in close air support. And although it could be argued AK-47 rifles are common household items, RPGs are not.

Assange said video evidence of the cameras was much clearer than it was of the weapons and that military statements about the presence of weapons had already been widely distributed. But critics say those watching the video online or on television for the first time may not have had any knowledge of those statements.

"It's ludicrous to allege that we have taken anything out of context in this video," Assange told Fox News.

Another point of contention comes later in the video when U.S. Apache helicopters open fire on two men in a van who had arrived at the courtyard to carry away one of the wounded. It was later learned that the wounded man was one of the photographers. WikiLeaks argues that attack violated the Army's rules of engagement. However, the military says that because the van had no visible markings to suggest it was an ambulance or a protected vehicle, it was fair game under Army rules.

According to Assange the assault on the van was the most damning piece of video evidence. "I'm very skeptical that was done under the rules of engagement; and if it was legal, the rules of engagement must be changed," Assange said.

So far the rules of engagement in Iraq have not changed.

Hanzlik called the death of the Reuters photographers "incredibly unfortunate." That sad part is, he said, they weren't wearing any markings or jerseys that would have signaled to U.S. forces they were members of the media.

WikiLeaks has another classified military video in their possession they plan to release in about a month. This time, Assange said, the public will see what happened during the controversial May 2009 NATO airstrike in Farah province, where Afghan officials say at least 150 civilians were killed.

dan9999
04-07-2010, 03:38 PM
Military can't find its copy of Iraq killing video
Pauline Jelinek And Anne Flaherty
Associated Press Writers
AP
Tue Apr 6, 8:37 pm ET

WASHINGTON – The U.S. military said Tuesday it can't find its copy of a video that shows two employees of the Reuters news agency being killed by Army helicopters in 2007, after a leaked version circulated the Internet and renewed questions about the attack.

Capt. Jack Hanzlik, a spokesman for U.S. Central Command, said that the military has not been able to locate the video within its files after being asked to authenticate the version available online.

"We had no reason to hold the video at (Central Command), nor did the higher headquarters in Iraq," Hanzlik said in an e-mailed statement. "We're attempting to retrieve the video from the unit who did the investigation."

It's the latest twist in a three-year saga that raises questions about the rules of engagement in battle and the safety of journalists sent to cover wars.

Advocates for increased government transparency also have questioned why the military withheld the video from the public, even though Reuters requested a copy through the Freedom of Information Act after watching it in an off-the-record meeting with the military in 2007.

The video includes audio of troops calling to "light 'em up!" and referring to the men as "dead bastards." An internal investigation concluded that the troops had acted appropriately, despite having mistaken the camera equipment for weapons.

"Clearly, it is unflattering to the military, but that is not justification for withholding it," said Steven Aftergood, an expert on government secrecy with the Federation of American Scientists.

The July 12, 2007, attack has been reported before. But Web site Wikileaks.org on Monday posted the video shot from one of the Apache helicopters, putting it on "collateralmurder.com" site.

Military officials said they believed the video was authentic, but that they had to compare the images and audio with their own video before confirming it publicly.

When pressed Tuesday on why the military had not released the video when other documents related to the investigation were made public, officials said they were still looking for it and weren't entirely sure where it was.

The video was taken by the tactical unit that operated the helicopters. The unit has only been identified as a "1st Air Cavalry Brigade," which reported to the Multinational Division in Baghdad.