Log in

View Full Version : Water leak reported at Ontario nuclear plant



andrshaw_3
03-16-2011, 11:22 PM
Staff are working overtime to fix a leak at the Pickering A Nuclear station that allowed 73,000 litres of demineralized water to seep into Lake Ontario Monday.

The leak caught the attention of Toronto-area residents who are focused on the damaged nuclear power plants and radioactive leak in tsunami-rocked Japan.

Ted Gruetzner, of Ontario Power Generation, said the leak stemmed from a faulty pump seal.

"It was a low level event with only negligible effect to the environment and no public health implications," Gruetzner said Wednesday. "The release was stopped on discovery and the pump seal is being replaced."

He said workers at the massive facility are making the repairs. Gruetzner said the demineralized water, which has had minerals removed and is cleaner than lake water, contained trace amounts of tritium that was far below regulatory limits.

The content of tritium in water at local treatment plants is between six and 10 becquerels per litre. The provincial standard for tritium in drinking water is 7,000 becqerels per litre. Gruetzner said the appropriate regulatory agencies and stakeholders were notified of the leak, including civic leaders and school principals.

"Members of the community know we run a safe plant," he said. "We are now trying to find out what happened and why."

The nuclear plant, along with its sister plant Pickering B, produce enough energy for a city of 1.5 million people.

source..hxxp://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3030354

JCO
03-16-2011, 11:27 PM
Staff are working overtime to fix a leak at the Pickering A Nuclear station that allowed 73,000 litres of demineralized water to seep into Lake Ontario Monday.

The leak caught the attention of Toronto-area residents who are focused on the damaged nuclear power plants and radioactive leak in tsunami-rocked Japan.

Ted Gruetzner, of Ontario Power Generation, said the leak stemmed from a faulty pump seal.

"It was a low level event with only negligible effect to the environment and no public health implications," Gruetzner said Wednesday. "The release was stopped on discovery and the pump seal is being replaced."

He said workers at the massive facility are making the repairs. Gruetzner said the demineralized water, which has had minerals removed and is cleaner than lake water, contained trace amounts of tritium that was far below regulatory limits.

The content of tritium in water at local treatment plants is between six and 10 becquerels per litre. The provincial standard for tritium in drinking water is 7,000 becqerels per litre. Gruetzner said the appropriate regulatory agencies and stakeholders were notified of the leak, including civic leaders and school principals.

"Members of the community know we run a safe plant," he said. "We are now trying to find out what happened and why."

The nuclear plant, along with its sister plant Pickering B, produce enough energy for a city of 1.5 million people.

source..hxxp://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3030354

Those plants have had issues for a long time..If the release is not so dangerous I would love to see the CEO and upper management drink a liter of that water to prove to us its not harmfull.. I serioully doubt they would..

ft@t@lk™
03-16-2011, 11:51 PM
when will we learn nuclear power is not clean nor safe
when the multi-billion dollar nuclear industry packs it in which is not about to happen anytime soon
sadly
instead we could be investing billions of dollars into solar wind and tidal powers

JCO
03-16-2011, 11:59 PM
when will we learn nuclear power is not clean nor safe
when the multi-billion dollar nuclear industry packs it in which is not about to happen anytime soon
sadly
instead we could be investing billions of dollars into solar wind and tidal powers

And also most importantly energy savings.. I have seen large buildings cut their consumption by over 60% by insulating, heat recovery, solar walls, destratification of air.. Its unbelievable how wastefull some older buildings are..
Some of the new LEED ofice buildings are using no power to heat besides electrical to run the heat pumps, and there not even using geothermal. Just profiting from solar heat gains, and other heat gains in the building that are unavoidable..
Wave power technology is in experimental mode in Europe for over 3 years and so far is quite conclusive.
Problem with solar and wind power is the storage of the energy, batteries are an environmental nightmare long term. Some are using the power at night to pump water uphill back into hydro damms..Anothe use would be to generate hydrogen for transportation..
We have to break our dependancy on fossil fuels soon..Its a non renewable resource which we are depleting quickly..

KIDWCKED
03-17-2011, 12:08 AM
I have seen some geothermal installations at a few job sites.It looks costly..If you can afford it probably not a bad idea.I'm sure there must be a government kick back??

JCO
03-17-2011, 12:16 AM
In office buildings there is so much heat gain from sun , computers, people and lighting in the middle of the building that it can be recuperated by heat pumps, put into a circulating water loop and...

ft@t@lk™
03-17-2011, 01:02 AM
tar ponds and nuclear waste pools
it's the world we live in
while other countries seek to eliminate and stall the use of nuclear energy (Germany and Switzerland come to mind), we seek solace in that an earthquake like Japan's could never happen here, while in hte process promoting it
false security