PDA

View Full Version : SPICING UP THIS SATURDAY'S SLUG FEST - An Analysis of Possible Outcomes for AMIR KHAN



aquariusone
07-20-2011, 10:26 PM
When you look at Amir Khan's boxing career, you will come to the conclusion that he is quite an astute planner. Just what is up in his sleeves come Saturday?

Before we look at the possibilities, let us briefly look at Zab Judah. Zab "rejuvenated" his career with victories (Split Decision) against Lucas Matthysse to pick the vacant WBO/NABO Welterweight Titles in November last year and then followed it with a TKO victory against Kaizer Mabuza to add the IBO Light Welterweight title to his credit last March. However, probably his most exciting and controversial fight in his career is his brawl with Floyd Mayweather in 2006. You all remembered how that fight resulted in a melee that had both camps ejected and his licence suspended for 1 year with a $350,000 fine.

Throughout his career, Zab was a fierce competitor. Unfortunately, his over zealousness has caused a lot of grief. He wants to win at all cost. So what are his chances with Khan?

Back to reality! Zab will be 34 a month after his fight with Khan who is 10 years younger. Although the betting crowd has closed the gap between the two (-400 to +300), Zab is facing a hungry lion.

And here is where it gets interesting. Amir is looking at his Judah fight as a "tune-up" because he wants to build credit and momentum to take on Tim Bradley. Already many believe that Khan has the edge against the WBO/WBC Light Welterweight champ because he could match Bradley's speed plus he's got power to put Bradley down.

So the scenario is this. Amir's "goal" is to take Judah's belts and then go after Bradley's titles. Imagine the pay-off for such accomplishment! He sets himself up for the biggest payday of his career - a plum outing against Floyd Mayweather; assuming that Mayweather gets past Ortiz. Thus, a win on Saturday and a win against Bradley is a sky train to glory and super mega-dollar fights from then on. With his looks, charisma, and all the belts he could collect, AMIR KHAN would be poised to raise his profile to the "Best-Pound-for-Pound" crown Manny Pacquiao will eventually vacate.

As for Judah, he wants his revenge against Mayweather. This complex boxing landscape is sure to light fire this Saturday.

Meanwhile, Paul McCloskey is salivating at the prospect of getting in the ring again against Amir. That could only happen if Zab Judah scores an upset - which unfortunately, I doubt very much. Why? the stakes for Amir Khan are so large to ignore. Judah is a stepping stone to that multi-million dollar payday!

Have fun watching....and do express your opinion freely whether you agree or not!

Fibroso
07-21-2011, 12:37 AM
He sets himself up for the biggest payday of his career - a plum outing against Floyd Mayweather; assuming that Mayweather gets past Ortiz. Thus, a win on Saturday and a win against Bradley is a sky train to glory and super mega-dollar fights from then on. With his looks, charisma, and all the belts he could collect, AMIR KHAN would be poised to raise his profile to the "Best-Pound-for-Pound" crown Manny Pacquiao will eventually vacate.
Wow ,do you really believe that? You write better than you dream, do you really think that Floyd will lose to Ortiz? Do you think Amir is better looking than Prince Hammed? You do know what happened to the Prince, he had a chin! You do believe anything that Roach trains is a messiah. Would you elect him to the British Parliament? You're in for a few surprises, this is boxing not Alice in Wonderland.

aquariusone
07-21-2011, 02:00 AM
Wow! I never dreamt of the day I'd get a compliment from you Senor Fibroso. Thank you!

However, for the sake of a civilized digression or philosophical debate, let us keep things in perspective.....and not get personal. We could be passionate about the sport and about our "views" and they could be entirely opposite. You will notice that lawyers in a courtroom pay great respect to their adversary and never use "direct" insults or accusations between themselves. They vigorously defend their position without attacking opposite views. Instead they offer facts to support their claims or beliefs. The issue is hotly contested but each lawyer does not lose his dignity even when the court may decide against their stance. So, as others might join in this debate, it is important that we all remain civil and friendly amongst each other and present our arguments for, or against, a proposition.

They proposition this thread contains is this: "Would Amir Khan defeat Zab Judah and eventually, Tim Bradley; and would Amir Khan earn a mega fight against Floyd Mayweather, assuming that Mayweather will be victorious against Ortiz?"

The opinion I stated above is my "opening statement". It is not yet a conclusion. That should follow as the debate progresses.

Fibroso
07-21-2011, 11:34 AM
They proposition this thread contains is this: "Would Amir Khan defeat Zab Judah and eventually, Tim Bradley; and would Amir Khan earn a mega fight against Floyd Mayweather, assuming that Mayweather will be victorious against Ortiz?"

Since I see lots of spectator and no opinions, lets keep this debate alive. You didn't answer my ?, I shall answer yours, NO. Just because cucaracho has taken over a good looking, young boxer, doesn't mean that he is going to make his chin stronger, he may teach him how to defend his jaw against uppers and left hooks but eventually one is going to land and take his legs away from under him. You can run but you can't hide.

aquariusone
07-21-2011, 12:46 PM
I am delighted to engage you. However, you asked four (4) questions. Let me attempt to be objective. I will answer them in reverse:
1) No, I am not a Brit and therefore can't vote or nominate anyone to the British Parliament.
2) Is Amir better looking than Prince Naseem Hamed? I prefer the likes of Catherine Zeta Jones or Halle Berry so I would pass on this one although I know from scoops in California that they are going gaga over Amir.
3) Would Ortiz beat Mayweather? No one gave Ortiz a chance to beat Berto. Look what happened.
4) Wow, do I really believe that? The question has no object; the word "that" is ambiguous as to what it refers to and therefore requires more specifics if answer is to be given.

:)