Log in

View Full Version : WWE Considering Taking Title Off CM Punk Due to Poor Ratings



ironworks
12-25-2011, 03:50 AM
MarcMiddleton 12/24/2011






F4WOnline.com reports that WWE officials are considering taking the WWE Championship off CM Punk due to 'terrible ratings patterns' for his weekly segments on RAW.

The matter was broached prior to Sunday's TLC pay-per-view event, which saw Punk ultimately retain the strap in a Triple Threat Tables, Ladders & Chairs Match against Alberto Del Rio and The Miz. The trend of lackluster ratings for his segments continued the following night on RAW as the program's overrun, which saw the Straight Edge Superstar, Daniel Bryan and Zack Ryder overcame The Miz, Alberto Del Rio and Dolph Ziggler, only gain 59,000 viewers.

Wrestling Observer editor Dave Meltzer analyzes: "That's almost impossible given people tune in to see the following show, which basically meant wrestling fans must have been tuning out in droves (they were during the first half of the match but then started gaining at 11 p.m., but hardly gained anything)."

The main event garnered a 2.67 cable rating (2.55 for the first half of the bout), which Meltzer says is by far, the lowest-rated main event on RAW in 2011 and possibly the lowest since 1997 for a non-holiday show in its regular time slot.

ironworks
12-25-2011, 03:51 AM
WWE Championship off CM Punk due to 'terrible ratings patterns' for his weekly segments on RAW

Seeeeeeeeeeee i told you......................lol

dishdude714
12-26-2011, 09:25 PM
So del rio or the miz is a lot better?

ironworks
12-26-2011, 11:40 PM
The Miz...............

dishdude714
12-27-2011, 07:54 PM
We might as well just put it back on Cena then

zoogor
12-27-2011, 08:13 PM
oh, im sure cena will have it soon. defiantly for mania IMO

zhong
12-27-2011, 08:45 PM
Get "The Undertaker" to come back and give it to him. Maybe ratings will be better.

zoogor
12-27-2011, 08:50 PM
undertaker was/is great but hard to hold the title and work everyday as a wrestler when your 90 years old.

ironworks
12-28-2011, 01:59 AM
90??????? Undertaker was born in 1965.............look at Nash born in 1959..............Flair born in 1949.........

I think Ziggler will take it from Punk for now...............

zoogor
12-28-2011, 10:26 AM
undertaker's only 46??? yeah, i suppose its possible. i started watching him when i was probably 14 or 15 in wcw as a skyscraper with dan spivey.
i guess that would have made him like 22 or 23 but he looks 60...life of a wrestler i guess

ironworks
12-28-2011, 09:53 PM
undertaker's only 46??? yeah, i suppose its possible. i started watching him when i was probably 14 or 15 in wcw as a skyscraper with dan spivey.
i guess that would have made him like 22 or 23 but he looks 60...life of a wrestler i guess

I do not disagree with you there.................