Originally Posted by
ftaalltheway
well, NAG has NOTHING to do with these cases, right??
dont NAG have their own attorneys? and DN theirs?
these letters are for iks connections why would NAG be involved??
if they had their cards compromised BUT to say they get involved with iks codes as
though the security of their cards has been comprinised is well, HOGWASH
this has been a misnomer for much too long and posts by so called JJee
and others (impostors)
over at the defunct site was very funny cuz THAT is where it all started
all to do with "scare mongering" ,,,nothing more nothing less
fact is, they could care less about IKS connectivity THATS DN's PROB
funny this thread has been though and for those who doubt me,,,
get a hold of NAG and find out for urselves what lawyers represent whom,,,
even IF their (dn's) "extortion" letters leads one to believe otherwise
they are 2 seperate entities
IF NAG was involved? youd see many more
of these tactics BUT with MUCH more SEVERE consequences/penalties