Names, we want names..LOL Who has a bullseye painted on them???:noidea:Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil Armstrong
Printable View
Names, we want names..LOL Who has a bullseye painted on them???:noidea:Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil Armstrong
what was the ilink forum?
not knowing either makes you one of the followingQuote:
Originally Posted by skatz420
#1. a newb
#2. naive
#3. stupid
That must be how you got all those wonderful gifts and thanks.
richie was not a bad person. He just did not think when he should have. He and I had many conversations and through them he proved his knowledge of true FTA, he has a lot to learn, as do I and many others. His laziness was annoying and forgetfulness unbelievable. To tell me "I'll be over in 30 minutes" and 2 hours passes. this was the usual. Anyway, "richiemiami, when you coming over to put up the 1M dish you sold me as a 1.2M dish. I think if you could you might, but I have my doubts. Word on the street is you don't know how, by several people that you know. That's what they tell me. Big deal, who cares. Those that speak poorly of you, so you can of them.
I still have the dish, motor, LNB. mast, etc. are you up for some legit work?
The ilinkforum was a nice forum, almost directed at Ilink. It was very similar to any other forum, except richie ruled with an IRON FIST.
richie liked to tell me how he "invented" the Ilink. What he really meant was, he introduced the Ilink brand to North America. I didn't notice he did very well with that, at least financially.
Must have been one heck of a deal he and Echo came to... He was, as little as 60 days ago, selling Viewsat Ultras with Weather Forecaster dongles on ebay.Quote:
Originally Posted by JCO
Either way be leery about purchasing anything like this from his handle (richiemiami/richimiami) from any site(s) or in person. I would have most certainly thought he could under any settlement not touch that stuff let alone trade in it for profit.
never the less, back in the day richie helped out a lot of users,,, and thou he ruled his site with an iron fist,,, everyone went back for more,,, remember guys he wasnt selling snowcones or ice cream he knew what he was doing and making a bunch of money doing it,,, every one who does this thing of ours knows the risk and the consequences yet we are all still here,,, i guess it must make all of us feel good to be a little bad, now all we have to worry about is THEM going after us little guys who just like the word "free"
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8_mile
I guess you don't know how settlements work, Why not find out the facts before you make it seem people are rats. I have no clue who ritchie is or do I care. But every settlement ever has been the same no touching piracy but they cannot ban you from real fta selling or talking about it. So if he is doing plain fta now that would not go against his settlement. Just like many others that went into selling fta after being sued and it was perfectly legal. Modchip it, nexus and arizia all sold legit fta after they were sued and after settlements and it was legal. So please get the facts before you put a rat beside their name, as a rat is the worst kind of person out there.
I suggest before you ride someone as you just did you read a bit closer. He stated that he was selling viewsats with the weather forcaster. Now why would you need the weather forecaster for FTA? Exactly... you don't. The weather forcaster is a piracy tool and combined with a FTA unit as a package makes it illegal. Simple as that.Quote:
Originally Posted by noman
just before ariza was sued they pushed there receivers to clear out stock , once they got sued everyone from ariza disappeared off the face of the FTA worldQuote:
Originally Posted by noman
Wrong there my friend, they opened a new shop at finch and dufferin area this time above finch. And that was even after the deals were made. All deals have that clause that fta , dishes and switches can still be sold.Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_angel
It's not simple as that , as long as he doesn't say it gets piracy or in any form shows any intent, it is not simple as that. But if the idiot sold them weather apps and said you can get free channels if you do this or go here then yes he is an idiot. And that would be a breach of his deal or settlement. But all settlements allow you to sell products still as long as they are not altered or marketed as piracy devices. Go look at them, 1 was posted a few years ago and all of them are the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anubis
Ok Sued by Echostar/Dish closed site down, disappeared from forums as per the agreement I'm sure (no fta sites dealing with piracy) so lets go ahead and start sell months after he is sued FTA boxes with Dongles to bypass and illegally get Echo/Dish content. Illegal period. Maybe Richie misses it, he did love to flaunt his "knowledge" all over and in video form. Selling a dongle used to bypass encryptions is illegal under the DMCA period. No one in their right mind would start up again after being hit with a "Yellow Pages size envelope" (paraphrased that but he said it was as thick as a phone book). Read the court papers fully, they wanted his ass, they ot his ass, he no doubt gave something up, paid a chunk of change or maybe not???? or them dongles may be more than weather forecasters for "cough", "cough" dish maybe they phone home so to speak. Or Richie just cant stay away, only a few reasons use logic here before you come at me. Maybe you are troll looking to try and debunk what I said, all I know is if I got sued by Echo I would stay away. Wouldn't you? I mean at that point it truly is "Game Over"
For all I know he planned on selling more until I called him out and you are nothing more than the debunker. In this game Im cautious. I trust no one online, period. Seeing him selling them I told the folks here to be careful, you attack it. I think its clear.
Him saying ohh this isnt for piracy is BS. That is not a legal defence to be innocent under the DMCA, use your head.
"Ohhh that dvd screener wasn't a movie it is a dongle that magically tells the weather your honour... My client is innocent. Ya right, read the law before you come at me. I have.
I still miss my little buddy:bawl: MUAHAHAHAQuote:
Originally Posted by Just_angel
Quote:
Originally Posted by noman
yep even Digital...the nfusion superman... still operated FTA stores after he was slammed
wonder where and what is he doing these days:D
but not all stayed in the game ...poor Viewsat KwaKwak and Pansat Armenian Blackilistee are partnered up in a Shawarma food joint ...hehe
Watchin' Dave, using a hack they never told anyone about...;)Quote:
Originally Posted by NOKIA
u mean the underground Dave hack... ;)
shshshsh:p
You know Bob would have told everyone. LOL!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by fifties
Dave??? Dave ???? Dave's not here.....:tehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by NOKIA
Shawarma really, i love that sheeeet. we calll em doniars here. where is there shop?
So Fred,
I guess asking for a RQ-SSST IKS bin for the Viewsat 2000 Extreme is out of the question????
TUBBS, TOO FUNNY!
dont see much update or court docs in this case lately , but do see a lot of BS that belongs in it own thread ...
here it is ....hehe
http://donairandfalafel.foodpages.ca...esDonairs_.jpg
I guess asking for a RQ-SSST IKS bin for the Viewsat 2000 Extreme is out of the question????Quote:
Originally Posted by Tubbs
There was never a file for the receiver to communicate through the serial port. Unless the sorce code is released or someone writes a file it wont happen.. Chances of a com file are next to nothing.
JMO
jco ...TUBBS knows that... he was being sarcastic...hehe:D
I'm not good with sarcasm... ROFLMAO
That's OK...Your good looks make up for it! ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by JCO
What?? or do you mean he is not good with that eitherQuote:
Originally Posted by fifties
I do agree...there is a great need for a sarcasm key.Quote:
Originally Posted by JCO
On December 1, 2011, Judge Kenneth Ryskamp entered final judgment and a permanent injunction against Defendant Richard (RichieMiami) Schwartz and his websites freefta.tv and ilinkforum.com <http://ilinkforum.com/> . Schwartz and his sites were sued by DISH Network <http://www.dishnetwork.com/> and NagraStar in February of this year for claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), Federal Communications Act and Federal Wiretap Act based on their distribution of software files designed to facilitate the unauthorized interception of DISH Network programming. The consent judgment included findings that Defendants acknowledge the software files distributed on the websites were primarily designed to facilitate unauthorized access and included judgment in favor of DISH Network and NagraStar on each of their claims. The judgment permanently enjoins Schwartz from further conduct, including the future operation of any similar websites and ruled that any such future violations would result in $110,000 in statutory damages per act. NagraStar and DISH Network continue to investigate and take action against individuals and entities responsible for trying to circumvent the companies security system in order to gain unauthorized access to DISH Network programming.Quote:
Originally Posted by noman
But hey, I guess 8milerd and myself just don't understand how judgements and or civil law works, lol...
He got off easy, much easier than all the others in most cases we read about or know about; yet still flaunts and disobeys court order by selling boxes. Hmm, my radar went off some at first site then and even more now.
He pays nothing as far as monetary damages with just a promise signed no doubt also agreed upon between him, his counsel and judge/pa. If someone can find the details openly and legally about this absolute plea bargain please post.
I know as fact as do a few of my colleagues "not engage in further conduct" is so vague and so non descriptive that it can have vastly different meaning from one person to the next.
Is his\ being here posting innocently enough about some brute technique to circumvent nag encryption "further conduct" even if it is a "ya they are and here is why" what about his even logging on at all? Or is it further conduct to sell dongles with only 1 reason and that reason is nagara3 iks workarounds.
What strikes me as oddest is that more than anything it is so vaguely wrote in just that single sentence to perfectly allow for cover. And to be in a legal position to maybe "snitch", but a better word is 'inform' and pass on intelligence on new trends, new sites, new players, etc..
The ruling left it so vague that it is informant 101 handbook and reference guide for all 3. Him, Judge and PA to say, nope that post is not in our interpretation "further conduct". This egging on and hyped IKS dongle spoke of and in course of this hype leading"may pursue further conduct" on many to buy from our dummy site is not in our interpretation "further conduct".
Lastly, no hitting a hard blow to his bank account.............. "Guess his being sued by echo wasnt close to "Engaging in further conduct"
2+2=5 in this game.. Read and learn the laws of that in which you may or may not
:innocent: there is no cure for dumb!! :tehe: no names mentioned just saying !
More innuendo and speculation elaborate further, please.Quote:
Originally Posted by bc420
Why post some jab at someone and not say at who?
Pet peeve of mine; internet armchair trolls which even in the course of said trollness still hide.. lol
Where was the posters innuendo and speculation?Quote:
Originally Posted by cball_ny
Sounds like a pretty accurate statement to me and there is no names mentioned. I fail to see any jab whatsoever?
Do you know of a cure for dumb?:innocent:
i do know the cure for dumb..its called the ban buttonQuote:
Originally Posted by Anubis
so play nice in the sandbox guys
Dishnet has figgured out that they and nagra can make big money from fta pirates and that nothing will stop the majority of fta freetvers so now that they used richimiami as a rat released bins for ilink and tracked ipaddresses made millions from settlements with freetvers aka end users
Now dishnet has released the ilink 9600 reolacement for 9500, HD box
Dealers like vancouverfta are selling it .
What's the deal are these dealers pawns? I mean there is no longer any leadership of any kind
Can gs2 tell us if there are any end user lawsuites in canada, already thousands been nailed inusa
Feel free to post this as seperate thread ifyou guys feel it should be
"already thousands nailed in USA"
HUH...
i'll be hiding under my bed if i'm needed..
Huh? The only end users being sued in the US are from the Dark Angel case. There are less than 70 of those.Quote:
Originally Posted by oolloo
Uhh, where are all those end users who have paid those millions. Haven't heard from any around these parts lately. What's wrong with you making up stories like that? Makes you feel important?Quote:
Originally Posted by oolloo
fifties--your a legend--for saying what you did --when-no one believed you--two thumbs up!! i remember!
Ilink made his$$$$$$$