And another thread lost in old boy/school girl crap.....
Back to topic please.
Printable View
And another thread lost in old boy/school girl crap.....
Back to topic please.
It might only be necessary or would have been necesaarry if the court says there is not enough proof that he did intercepted the signal with the court interpretating it as necesarry. quote GS2
IKs can only happen by means of a Nagra image, by means of connectivity from bins from fta's posted with dongle transmission or RQSC and a serial port with a valid rom image, purchases of codes to hook up proves nothing towards breach of copyright, once an image along with a bin is utilized can the claim be made of copyright infringement <---notice the word,
OK, this thread is serious so let's not turn it into a bash fest...back to topic please, thank you.
On the contrary. You will see declarations presented to the court from DN investigators who subscribed to the same IKS service. They will state under oath that the purchase and use of these access codes allowed them to view DN's programming without paying DN.
Then DN will present evidence to the court that the defendant purchased the same kind of subscription. That is more than enough circumstantial evidence for the court to find against the defendant.
remember Marvin these threads are read and used as evidence in trial procedings are you saying that dishnetwork downloded bins and used them for testimony as evidence ? that can only mean one thing Marvin
who's side are you on?
Marvin why did Kudelski supply a card that was already compromised in Europe ? visa vie IKS why is that ?
Marvin everyone needs to hear from you on many subjects you wish to discuss, tell us more