Federal Court enters final judgment against NFPS end-user Mourad LaTreche

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jets

shaw,SC can be clone... or so I heard.

---

or better yet...someone on inside to activate boxes;)

that has been around for years. nothing new but not something the average Joe can do. From what I have heard years ago it is a slow nd painful process and not even worth the guys time that was doing it.

So
Dish came after subscribers that used NFPS, well what is going to happen to IPTV.
I can get all of that programming free on IPTV. That would be my defense.

not much of a defense there. Just because you could get it free someplace else does not give you the right to steal it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sabinalu

I was under the impression that as a Pro Se defendant in Florida Small Claims Court, Discovery directed towards me was limited. The lawyers for the Plaintiff filed a motion with the Court for Discovery, as well as a request for Summary Judgment, and both motion requests were approved by the Judge.

I have not requested any Discovery, so the only other option for the granting of their request is by "the leave of the Court" according to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Is this common? Am I missing something? I thought that a Discovery request could happen after a Final Judgment was ordered if indeed I were to lose, but not only after a pre-trail hearing.

Should I can I respond to the Court with my objections in a separate motion of my own?

Thanks.

---

A) you are hijacking a thread

B) this is not the place for legal advise.... if you don't want to pay a lawyer, you should at least ask in a legal forum site?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sabinalu

I was under the impression that as a Pro Se defendant in Florida Small Claims Court, Discovery directed towards me was limited. The lawyers for the Plaintiff filed a motion with the Court for Discovery, as well as a request for Summary Judgment, and both motion requests were approved by the Judge.

I have not requested any Discovery, so the only other option for the granting of their request is by "the leave of the Court" according to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Is this common? Am I missing something? I thought that a Discovery request could happen after a Final Judgment was ordered if indeed I were to lose, but not only after a pre-trail hearing.

Should I can I respond to the Court with my objections in a separate motion of my own?

Thanks.

---

If they sued you, it would be in Federal court, not any state court.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sabinalu

I was under the impression that as a Pro Se defendant in Florida Small Claims Court, Discovery directed towards me was limited. The lawyers for the Plaintiff filed a motion with the Court for Discovery, as well as a request for Summary Judgment, and both motion requests were approved by the Judge.

I have not requested any Discovery, so the only other option for the granting of their request is by "the leave of the Court" according to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Is this common? Am I missing something? I thought that a Discovery request could happen after a Final Judgment was ordered if indeed I were to lose, but not only after a pre-trail hearing.

Should I can I respond to the Court with my objections in a separate motion of my own?

Thanks.

---

If summary judgment was granted than I suppose you did not oppose it ? or if you did the court decided the Plaintiff's version of facts and law were correct. If you did respond ? than you would need to show a different version of facts with some evidence and show that the Plaintiff's arguments of the law are incorrect.



GS2

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChillyWilly

A) you are hijacking a thread

B) this is not the place for legal advise.... if you don't want to pay a lawyer, you should at least ask in a legal forum site?

---

It is very fair to say these are not professional legal opinions here unless someone is a lawyer just opinions. People can say we are giving legal opinions and shouldn't, but to be clear I and others are just giving opinions just like you don't need to be a politician to give political opinions.


If you want a legal professional opinion than ask a lawyer but sometimes people are curious to know what we think as non professionals.



GS2

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sabinalu

I was under the impression that as a Pro Se defendant in Florida Small Claims Court, Discovery directed towards me was limited. The lawyers for the Plaintiff filed a motion with the Court for Discovery, as well as a request for Summary Judgment, and both motion requests were approved by the Judge.

I have not requested any Discovery, so the only other option for the granting of their request is by "the leave of the Court" according to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Is this common? Am I missing something? I thought that a Discovery request could happen after a Final Judgment was ordered if indeed I were to lose, but not only after a pre-trail hearing.

Should I can I respond to the Court with my objections in a separate motion of my own?

Thanks.

---

If a final judgment was ordered than the case would be over in my non professional opinion.



GS2

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tubbs

So
Dish came after subscribers that used NFPS, well what is going to happen to IPTV.
I can get all of that programming free on IPTV. That would be my defense.

---

You can get local networks free on a roof top antenna that is not encrypted and are legal reception. However the same networks on DN are encrypted that require a paid subscription and if you receive them without making payment to DN than its not lawful. legally one has nothing to do with the other.



GS2

Long live TFTA.