Others call it crime doesn't pay.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hannibalector
Printable View
Others call it crime doesn't pay.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hannibalector
actually Harry it pays well for those not getting caught, but for those that do get caught ... well then they pay well :)Quote:
Originally Posted by hondoharry
you cant view beverley in the states so buying a code would be pointlessQuote:
Originally Posted by Russ
unless you are in the extreme north near the border
Like say Michigan? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Grave Digger
Ok, I have been quiet untill everything got settled, so here goes. I recieved a letter,thanks to wuff, I sent them the money and a letter that stated that if they cashed my check that all previous wrong doings before my dated check would be overlooked and that no civil,crimminal, or monitary actions could be taken against me. And they accepted and cashed my check. I would suggest that anyone paying them send a like wise letter to keep out of trouble down the road if they find something else. (like another donation from someone else) Also there was nothing about pay pal, all info was against me from his computer.
Did they not request something from you in the form of writing that you would not participate in piracy, etc.? I thought they requested something to that effect.Quote:
Originally Posted by nitrogabby
Yes they did they want you to write a letter stating that you will not buy anything to pirate their signals. I just added my paragraph in there to protect myself.
That's smart thinking.Quote:
Originally Posted by nitrogabby
Kind of like the 'ole "payment in full" that you used to write on a check. Cash the check and consider yourself "paid in full". Very smart thinking my friend.
I honestly don't think paypal turned over any information. All they really would need to do is put pressure on Wuf to turn over his personal statements from paypal.Quote:
Originally Posted by nitrogabby
just goes to show it's all about the money and the ambulance chasing and less about securing the signal, good on you for having a head on your shoulders on the matter. thanks for the postQuote:
Originally Posted by nitrogabby
All the DN end user lawsuits have been in the US so far? Wonder if they have grounds to go after people in Canada?
Duh, of course they got info. from PayPal. In a normal transaction Wuf would have nothing on his computer about your real name and address to send the letter unless you gave it to him voluntarily.Quote:
Originally Posted by nitrogabby
You don't get personal statements from Paypal. All you get is an "online" statement but that doesn't show i.p. address's of the people sending money, nor their transactions, nor their address, nor anything else about them. Also i.p. address's would not have been something on Wuf's computer.Quote:
Originally Posted by steveOtoo
Paypal most definitely rolled and gave up information on the transactions.
Don't think it was a matter of them "rolling" but the fact that they were most likely handed a warrant to produce information. JMOQuote:
Originally Posted by sodusme
This post is going round and round and round lol. We all know PP is owned by fleabay (even though they allow the sale of FTA boxes) but fleabay would roll at the drop of a dime under pressure from DN and hence, PP. I would think it may be Dixon's bank account or the fact he kept a record of users on his PC. Be a whole lot cheaper than going after PP. IMHO