Dish Network v. Schwartz (richiemiami/ilinkforum)

"already thousands nailed in USA"
HUH...
i'll be hiding under my bed if i'm needed..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by oolloo

Dishnet has figgured out that they and nagra can make big money from fta pirates and that nothing will stop the majority of fta freetvers so now that they used richimiami as a rat released bins for ilink and tracked ipaddresses made millions from settlements with freetvers aka end users


Now dishnet has released the ilink 9600 reolacement for 9500, HD box
Dealers like vancouverfta are selling it .


What's the deal are these dealers pawns? I mean there is no longer any leadership of any kind
Can gs2 tell us if there are any end user lawsuites in canada, already thousands been nailed inusa


Feel free to post this as seperate thread ifyou guys feel it should be

---

Huh? The only end users being sued in the US are from the Dark Angel case. There are less than 70 of those.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by oolloo

Dishnet has figgured out that they and nagra can make big money from fta pirates and that nothing will stop the majority of fta freetvers so now that they used richimiami as a rat released bins for ilink and tracked ipaddresses made millions from settlements with freetvers aka end users

---

Uhh, where are all those end users who have paid those millions. Haven't heard from any around these parts lately. What's wrong with you making up stories like that? Makes you feel important?

fifties--your a legend--for saying what you did --when-no one believed you--two thumbs up!! i remember!

Ilink made his$$$$$$$

I was not gonna reply at all till I realized I needed to get my post count up, I'm done with this thread, I only meant to do one post, till another guy told me my post count needs to be higher ,

lmao

beware guys who are busted and or have co-operated/informed in the past
simple generaly accepted rule
up to you if you don't like it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by oolloo

I was not gonna reply at all till I realized I needed to get my post count up,
.

---

you could have saved me a whole lot of BS reading if you just went to the welcome section and said hello to 10 ppl to get your post count up

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by oolloo

I was not gonna reply at all till I realized I needed to get my post count up, I'm done with this thread, I only meant to do one post, till another guy told me my post count needs to be higher ,

lmao

beware guys who are busted and or have co-operated/informed in the past
simple generaly accepted rule
up to you if you don't like it.

---

Thanks for telling us, now all those hijacked and repetitive posts have been deleted. And the post count is reset...
Spaming a thread to get your post count up is not acceptable..

:laughat:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JCO

Thanks for telling us, now all those hijacked and repetitive posts have been deleted. And the post count is reset...
Spaming a thread to get your post count up is not acceptable..

---

cheers !!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bandit2804

fifties--your a legend--for saying what you did --when-no one believed you--two thumbs up!! i remember!

---

Glad you do, 'cause I don't, bwahahaha!

Ummm, what'd I say?

(That was also the title to a Ray Charles record in 1959, BTW...Just some more useless trivia from my ancient grey-matter).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JCO

I guess asking for a RQ-SSST IKS bin for the Viewsat 2000 Extreme is out of the question????
There was never a file for the receiver to communicate through the serial port. Unless the sorce code is released or someone writes a file it wont happen.. Chances of a com file are next to nothing.
JMO

---

There has been work on another site that if someone assembles the bits and pieces has VS2000 Plat running IKS, so I am sure that a VS2000 Extreme could be made to work.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lemming

Huh? The only end users being sued in the US are from the Dark Angel case. There are less than 70 of those.

---

There were likely hundreds of demand letters sent out assuming there were probably hundreds of Dark Angel customers. The number of cases would be far less since some settle on the demand letter perfering to avoid court and being sued.



GS2

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gunsmoke2 - GS2

There were likely hundreds of demand letters sent out assuming there were probably hundreds of Dark Angel customers. The number of cases would be far less since some settle on the demand letter perfering to avoid court and being sued.



S2

---

if even one had settled out of court I'm sure that would've been posted on satscams to encourage others

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dishuser

if even one had settled out of court I'm sure that would've been posted on satscams to encourage others

---

I do not think so. That's private if you settle out of court with the demand letter. One reason you do so is to avoid your name showing up in public in a court document. People have settled with demand letters in the past with DTV and it only got publicised with their nick not real name when the poster/defendant posted themselves that they decided to settle versus risking going to court.



GS2

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gunsmoke2 - GS2

I do not think so. That's private if you settle out of court with the demand letter. One reason you do so is to avoid your name showing up in public in a court document. People have settled with demand letters in the past with DTV and it only got publicised with their nick not real name when the poster/defendant posted themselves that they decided to settle versus risking going to court.



GS2

---

I don't mean names would be posted