Thats funny. Try and prove that in court.Quote:
Originally Posted by Highwayman
bigbird
Printable View
Thats funny. Try and prove that in court.Quote:
Originally Posted by Highwayman
bigbird
Well that is where I'm a little smarter then the average bear....Quote:
Originally Posted by notocer
Now I'm not saying anything disparaging about anyone here but I can tell you that I may or may not have ran stand alone for years....and I would be willing to bet that no one on these sites except maybe a handful from staff on the site I mod at can tell me what I ran and for how long....if at all?
Whenever I posted any advice it was always 'third' party i.e. "I heard that to get the guide on XYZ receiver you can park it on ch. ABC for X amount of time." or "I believe I read where to set the clock on XYZ receiver you have to....". I never posted first hand knowledge about any receiver I may or may not have ran and I never posted about specific channels or events. ;)
Your reference, please?Quote:
Originally Posted by MarvinGardens
Quote:
Originally Posted by fifties
I just don't see where either side had to pay anything. Perhaps I am just missing it.Quote:
STIPULATION FOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiffs DISH Network L.L.C., EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., and NagraStar LLC (collectively, “DISH Network”), and Defendant Kailas Magi respectfully notify the Court of the parties’ settlement of this action. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, DISH Network voluntarily dismisses this action against Defendant with prejudice. No costs are to be assessed to any party.
Costs are 'COURT COSTS' not settelment amounts. Sometimes means that it was arbritrated out, as you pay the arbritrator (firm) for their services and both sides ask the court to dismss the case.
Quote:
DISH Network voluntarily dismisses this action
OK, so what we know is, DN dropped the case, and per the description of "with prejudice" from NOLO, agreed to never sue him again for this activity.Quote:
When a lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice, the court is saying that it has made a final determination on the merits of the case, and that the plaintiff is therefore forbidden from filing another lawsuit based on the same grounds.
What we don't know, however, is, did it cost him anything (to satisfy the plaintiff's complaint)? Court costs don't factor in here; those are primarily legal fees (lawyer's time).
I dont know if he had to pay Dish to settle, it does not state that.Quote:
Originally Posted by fifties
It also does not state there was an injunction of any kind.
It does not state there was a confidential settlement.
It is quite simple, the case was dismissed, it states that.
This is not typical of all the cases I posted. I had to read everyone of them to compile the list. This case does not follow typical protocol of any case handled by Chad and associates. It may be just wishful thinking, but it seems on the surface a victory.
Again it does not state it was a confidential settlement, so it would be interesting what Magi's attorney has to say. Heck, he could certainly drum up some business by coming here and expressing his opinion, outside of client attorney privilege.
Ok i got the info from gary ruff ..it looks like it can help out. for the ones that got the letter i would be happy to share it but if anyone is willing to help cover the cost of it i would appreciate that .
Ya that is the kicker...the unknowning of why they really dropped the case ..I guess we can assume..but sure bring up alot of question ...did he have info ?? where they wrong ?and so on ..but what ever it is ..my guess they will not let anyone know to the fact . So know can do the same ..Quote:
Originally Posted by fifties
Is Gary Ruff the attorney that handled Magi's case? Did this cost you $ to find out? If it could be outed here in the open, it could throttle DN's legal bulldogs.Quote:
Originally Posted by norm155
this is gary ruff
hxxp://www.piratecardblues.com/
this is magi's attorney
hxxp://www.corporationwiki.com/Texas/Gilmer/nelson-associates-attorneys-at-law-pc/108324713.aspx
I will post the info later of what i got from gary ruff
We await with baited breath.:thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by norm155
Be very careful what you post....Quote:
Originally Posted by norm155
I'd hate to the site get in trouble or you yourself. This guy is an attorney so its probably best not to post that out in the open. He'll be all over that like a pitbull on a poodle if he finds out.Quote:
Gary Ruff; all rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without the express permission of the author, except that “links” to the site are permitted. Contact author at 631.390.8338.
Just an FYI. ;)