Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: True FTA and FTA on the same dish

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    40
    Satfix Buxs
    28,951
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts

    Default True FTA and FTA on the same dish

    I guys, so i have a modified dish 18inch with two circular LNB(One i use, the other one i dont), and a hh90 motor, which works amazing with all the sats that require circular lnb, but now i have installed an universal LNB beside the circular to see if i can get some true FTA sats, but the problem i have, yes i know the dish is too small for true FTA, but i heard there are some exceptions like SES 101W with an 18inch dish you could get some channels, but for me is not working, i live in Toronto, any idea of other sats i could point to? strong TP signal/strong signal? idk if my lnb isnt align properly or my setup isnt working, i have my circular lnb connected to 1 on the diseqc and universal lnb on 2, and then to the motor, and then from motor to the receiver, im only able to get my circular to work, my Universal doesnt work, anyone knows? even if the dish is too small, i should be able to get something with the strongest Sats and TPs, any suggestions?

    Here are some pics:

    IMG_3728.jpgIMG_3724.jpgIMG_3730.jpgIMG_3725.jpgIMG_3722.jpg
    Last edited by alex.1604; 04-27-2014 at 11:34 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    9,003
    Satfix Buxs
    4,002,465
    Thanks
    3,658
    Thanked 8,666x in 3,246 Posts
    Items PhoneHeartVintage truck
Gift received at 12-23-2012, 09:06 AM from ICEMAN
Message: thank you budTVCoffee makerPinkfloydthe travel gnomeTractor

    Default

    Dump the universal and the other LNB's and go with one single LNB for both linear (true FTA satellites) and circular (for Dish and BEV) satellites.

    A Invacom QPH -031 LNB would be the best for this setup.

    However you will need a bigger dish, a 39" would be the best choice, as all the linear satellites show a minimum dish size of 33".


    Now, where you have the universal mounted is a problem, it is out of the focal area for the satellite arc, it is too high, you wont track the arc of the Clark belt correctly.

    You should remove one of the DP LNB's and mount the universal in it's place.
    ♫♫♫ I’m a lumberjack and I’m OK ♫♫♫ I drink all night and sleep all day. ♫♫♫



    Coming soon to a crop circle near you.....

    There is a 66 and third % chance that I'm on the right planet...

    "I'm happier then a Jackalope in a balloon factory"

    "First rule of testing satellites"
    "If its working fine now, then don't mess with it"

    "Second rule of testing satellites"
    "If you did mess with it, and now it doesn't work, can you blame someone else?"

    "Third rule of testing satellites"
    "If you did mess with it, and it doesn't work now, and you can't blame someone else"
    "Can you HIDE it"?

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Terryl For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    98
    Satfix Buxs
    920
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 38x in 20 Posts

    Default

    Yes the Invacom works great. I have 2 setups. You need to be careful on max dish size in the GTA though as Brampton bylaws limit max size to 1 meter and other GTA areas will have similar bylaws.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    22,807
    Satfix Buxs
    2,206,751
    Thanks
    36,977
    Thanked 26,257x in 7,929 Posts
    Items GreeceCanada

    Default

    A 1m dish is exactly what you need and it will keep you legally ok. If you want to do both then I have to agree that an invacom quad with 2 circular and 2 linear ports is the best way to go, I used to have that setup as well. Are your settings correct for your universal lnb? 9750/10600 is what's required and just out of curiosity, what receiver are you using for true fta?







  6. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,365
    Satfix Buxs
    7,987
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 1,523x in 764 Posts

    Default

    For best results put any linear LNBs at the focal point of the dish (or as near as you can get them) and any circular (if you have separate LNBs) off-axis (ie away from center focal point). Circular polarized signals are far more forgiving in off-axis use than linear (off axis focal points have out-of-phase contributions and those are real problems for linear pol signals). The arc of where to put LNBs to get the Clark belt sats is most easily visualized if you think of the parabolic dish as a spherical reflector--the focal points are half-way between the sphere center and the surface of the dish on the line pointing to the satellite and going through the focal point as well as the sphere center (so picture an arc midway between center and surface--all LNBs have to be on that arc).

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to jvvh5897 For This Useful Post:


  8. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,365
    Satfix Buxs
    7,987
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 1,523x in 764 Posts

    Default

    BTW a quick calculation can give you the place to put an LNB. If the difference between the center azmuth of the dish and the one you want is "a" then the distance from the 0,0,0 point to the LNB is found from:
    z = f * (1 + 0.5 * (tan(a))^2) where f is the focal length of the dish and it is on the z axis.
    y = z * tan(a) where y is the distance to one side of the LNB--I typically just use f * tan(a) rather than figure z. You can do a similar equation for x = z * tan(e) where e is the elevation diff from elevation you are at to the elev you want to point to. For circular pol signals the Q readings should drop off as cos(a) (so if you are 45 degrees to one side of center you would only drop to Q of 0.7 of the center for the same sat), for linear it is not just the cosine drop that geometry requires but the phase problem too--I have not had good luck doing linear sats beyond 15 degrees or so off-axis, but have measured circular signals to 45 degree off center.

    The calcs are really just an approx as the "focal" point off-axis are an arc rather than a single point--if you twist the LNB just right it will intercept most all the contributions of the dish, but not all of them will be in-phase and as you increase the angle it gets harder and harder to find a "sweet" spot. For any that might be interested I have a couple of qbasic programs to ray trace the parabola in 2D or sort of 3D by having a "viewing plane" of where rays end up from an array of points on a mathematical surface behind the viewing plane (it is easy to see the coma distortion on the viewing plane and tilt it to see how well you might correct that distortion).

    An 18 inch dish at Ku band will have a beam width of about 57/18--about 3 degree or so (the dish 500 is 20.75 inches across--so 57/20.75 is about 2.75 degrees beamwidth. That dish is 22.5 inches high and f looks to be 12 inches.) Gain is a function of dish area, so if you wish to compare two dishes, just make a ratio of the square of the radii (and if you wish to know the dB diff just take ten times the log of that ratio).
    Last edited by jvvh5897; 06-20-2014 at 08:06 PM.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jvvh5897 For This Useful Post:


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •