c and p
AVE STATED OVER AND OVER AGAIN FOR THOSE WHO RECEIVE A LETTER, WHO IS LIKELY TO BE SUED AND WHO PROBABLY WILL NOT. DN WILL NOT FILE A LAWSUIT IF THE ONLY EVIDENCE THEY HAVE IS A CODE PURCHASE REGARDLESS OF HOW MUCH DOCUMENTATION THEY HAVE TO PROVE THAT PURCHASE. TO DATE THEY HAVE ONLY FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST THOSE THAT DO NOT RESPOND TO THE LETTER IF THEY HAVE ADDITIONAL SUPPORTING EVIDENCE. I HAVE ADDRESSED THAT AND EXPLAINED WHAT THAT EVIDENCE USUALLY IS.
THE FOLLOWING IS A C/P EXCERPT FROM MY POST #333 IN THIS THREAD!
RESPOND TO THE LETTER OR NOT? - OR WHO GETS SUED AND WHO DOESN'T?
YOU ARE PROBABLY SAFE IF YOU DO NOT RESPOND TO THE LETTER IF
THE ONLY EVIDENCE DN HAS AGAINST YOU IS THEY ARE ABLE TO PROVE WITH COPIES OF EMAILS AND PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS THAT YOU PURCHASED AN ACCESS CODE -THEY WILL NOT FILE A LAWSUIT IF THE LETTER IS IGNORED - IN THE PAST THEY HAVE NOT FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST INDIVIDUALS WHERE THE ONLY EVIDENCE THEY HAVE IS AN ACCESS CODE PURCHASE.
PROBABLY A LAWSUIT IF YOU FAIL TO RESPOND TO THE LETTER
IN THE PAST THEY HAVE ONLY FILED LAWSUITS AGAINST THOSE THAT IGNORED THE LETTER IF THEY HAD ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THEIR ALLEGATIONS BEYOND THE FACT THAT THE INDIVIDUAL PURCHASED AN ACCESS CODE. IF DN HAS ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE BEYOND THE ACCESS CODE PURCHASE THEY DO NOT DISCLOSE IT IN THE LETTER (this additional evidence is explained below). THEY WILL FILE A LAWSUIT AGAINST THOSE THAT IGNORE THE LETTER IF THEY HAVE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE .
DN only files lawsuits if they have basically a slam dunk case against the defendant. If they file a lawsuit, the defendant has already lost the case and ultimately they will obtain a judgment against the defendant in an amount around $10,000.
WHAT SHOULD YOU DO OR NOT DO - HOW SHOULD YOU HANDLE THIS LETTER ?
What is the additional evidence that DN may have against you that they have not disclosed in the Letter which would cause them to file a lawsuit if you fail to respond to the letter?
The most common evidence that DN has used in the past if they file a lawsuit is
SELF INCRIMINATING STATEMENTS.
I WILL EXPLAIN THESE AS IT IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT THAT YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT CAN BE USED AGAINST YOU BEFORE DECIDING WHETHER TO PAY OR IGNORE THE LETTER.
WHO GETS SUED IF THEY IGNORE THE LETTER
1. IF YOU HAVE VIA PM OR EMAIL WITH YOUR RESELLER INDICATED IN ANYWAY WHATSOEVER THAT YOU HAVE UTILIZED OR ARE ATTEMPTING TO UTILIZE THE ACCESS CODE - IT IS LIKELY THAT DN HAS COPIES OF THESE COMMUNICATIONS AND THOSE STATEMENTS CAN BE CONSIDERED AS CORROBORATING EVIDENCE AND IF THE LETTER IS IGNORED THEY WILL SUE YOU AND THEY WILL WIN. BY UTILIZED OR ATTEMPT TO UTILIZE THE CODE MEANS IF YOU HAVE STATED YOU ARE UP, DOWN, ASKING ABOUT CERTAIN CHANNELS, ASKING FOR HELP TO INSTALL THE CODES OR ANYTHING THAT INDICATES YOU ARE USING OR ATTEMPTING TO USE THE SERVICE YOU NEED TO CONTEMPLATE SETTLING WITH DN AS INDICATED IN THE LETTER BECAUSE THEY WILL SUE YOU IF YOU IGNORE IT.
2. IF YOU HAVE PROVIDED THE RESELLER VIA PM OR EMAIL WITH YOUR SCREEN NAME AND YOU HAVE POSTED IN ANY OF THE FORUMS SIMILAR TO WHAT IS INCLUDED ABOVE, ANYTHING THAT WOULD INDICATE IN YOUR POST THAT YOU ARE USING OR ATTEMPTING TO USE THE CODE BE ASSURED THAT DN HAS COPIES OF THOSE POSTS AND THAT IS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THEIR ALLEGATIONS AND AGAIN YOU SHOULD SERIOUSLY CONTEMPLATE A SETTLEMENT RATHER THAN WAIT TO BE SUED.
3. IF YOU PURCHASED MORE THAN ONE ACCESS CODE THAN THAT APPARENTLY IS CONSIDERED SUFFICIENT SUPPORTING EVIDENCE AND TO BEST OF OUR UNDERSTANDING THEY WILL FILE A LAWSUIT IF THE LETTER IS IGNORED. (THIS HAS YET TO BE VERIFIED BUT WE BELIEVE IT TO BE TRUE AT THIS TIME).
WHO IS THE PAST DOES NOT GET SUED IF THEY IGNORE THE LETTER
IF THE ONLY EVIDENCE THAT DN HAS AGAINST YOU IS WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THE LETTER e.g. COPIES OF THE EMAIL BETWEEN THE RESELLER AND YOU AND COPIES OF THE PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS AND YOU IGNORE THE LETTER, PAST HISTORY INDICATES THAT THEY WILL NOT FILE A LAWSUIT.
IF YOU HAVE POSTED IN THE FORUMS POSTS THAT WOULD INDICATE THAT YOU ARE OR ATTEMPTING TO USE THE CODE BUT YOU HAVE NEVER DISCLOSED YOUR SCREEN NAME TO ANYONE THEN IT IS UNLIKELY THAT YOU HAVE COMPROMISED YOURSELF AND DN IS UNLIKELY TO BE ABLE TO RELATE THOSE POSTS TO THE INDIVIDUAL IN THE LETTER WHO PURCHASED THE CODE.
IF YOU DECIDE TO IGNORE THE LETTER BE POSITIVE THAT YOU NEVER DISCLOSED YOUR SCREEN NAME TO ANYONE AND IF YOU DID, YOU NEVER POSTED IN THE FORUMS ANYTHING THAT COULD BE CONSTRUED IN ANYWAY WHATSOEVER THAT YOU WERE UTILIZING YOUR ACCESS CODE OR EVEN ATTEMPTING TO UTILIZE THE CODES. BE POSITIVE THAT YOU NEVER COMMUNICATED ANYTHING TO THE RESELLER INDICATING USE.
end of c/p from post #333
if you read paragraph 2 above under Self Incriminating Statements you will see that I have indeed stated that forum posts at this site can and have been used against end users.
EHG
Not my Work got this from another site C+P