Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 76 to 85 of 85

Thread: zoogor and satlobo

  1. #76
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    12,184
    Satfix Buxs
    27,719
    Thanks
    20,496
    Thanked 21,237x in 6,877 Posts
    Items Martini
Gift received at 12-13-2013, 03:34 PM from swanner
Message: Congradulations Anubis on your 10,000 Post.
Celebration Time, Keep up the good work BudSome beer
Gift received at 07-18-2013, 04:52 PM from marcelect
Message: wHAT COMES AROUND GOES AROUND.HAvein this heat wavethis cold oneFriesPizzaBurgerBeefTrophy 3
Gift received at 12-15-2012, 11:21 AM from ICEMANFootball
Gift received at 11-06-2012, 03:44 AM from Styx_N_Stones
Message: After your comment about...

'lol I gave him a couple g's and he blew it all in a matter of hrs'

I didn't want you to think I was spending the money on myself. That's why I posted a reply explaining where the SatFix Bux went.

Here's a little token of my gratitude for your generous donation. Please accept it in the spirit that its meant...

S_N_S

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by c8rbk1ng View Post
    Did you miss the part of my post saying, "if you don't have a pot to p**s in"? If you're not working or have a low income what are they going to garnish?

    C/P
    If a creditor obtains a court order to garnish your wages, federal law limits the amount that can be taken to 25% of your disposable earnings or the amount by which your weekly disposable income exceeds 30 times the federal minimum wage, whichever is lower.
    End C/P

    It's actually a lot harder than you think to collect a judgement. If you don't have disposable income what are they going to take? Nothing! I've won a few judgements against people when I had my business and if they won't pay you, you need to hire US Marshalls to go collect and the amount you pay them to do this is almost the total amount of the judgement, so they basically get the money and you don't. Like I said, winning a judgement and collecting a judgement are two different things.
    They will collect personal item with a cash value such as cars, motorcycles, property.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Anubis For This Useful Post:


  3. #77
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    16,241
    Satfix Buxs
    2,380,488,878,337
    Thanks
    23,716
    Thanked 27,831x in 10,218 Posts
    Items DevilBeef
Gift received at 01-24-2014, 04:26 PM from swanner
Message: Thanks for Your Input, with all the Hot Heads around.. Should be cooked in No Time..LOLDish
Gift received at 12-15-2013, 09:10 PM from holly2012
Message: From an Old FriendDog
Gift received at 10-30-2013, 12:15 AM from Just_angel
Message: love chloe xoxoxWhiskey
Gift received at 03-27-2013, 03:33 PM from thebeav
Message: found this behind the dumpster at the casino when i was looking for W H :)Heart
Gift received at 11-20-2012, 12:22 PM from Just_angel
Message: x0x0A Beer
Gift received at 11-06-2012, 03:58 AM from Styx_N_Stones
Message: I seem to have accumulated too many beers... LOL!Crown Royal
Gift received at 10-11-2012, 03:49 PM from Just_angel

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anubis View Post
    They will collect personal item with a cash value such as cars, motorcycles, property.
    not in Florida

    DODGE the father

    RAM the daughter



    “Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut.”

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to dishuser For This Useful Post:


  5. #78
    c8rbk1ng's Avatar
    c8rbk1ng is offline VIP, Satfix 2014 NFL Pool Week #5 & week # 15 Champion
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    7,865
    Satfix Buxs
    29,477
    Thanks
    1,733
    Thanked 4,089x in 1,142 Posts
    Items Crab
Gift received at 08-08-2015, 07:53 PM from gAsH
Message: I tried 15x in a row with different people and lost every time! :lol: 

Here is a gift for the crabby old man :tehe: You spelled your name wrong, should be Cr8bk1ng :PWireless AccessPopcornGuitar2JeepCamaroFootball

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anubis View Post
    They will collect personal item with a cash value such as cars, motorcycles, property.
    Again, the operative statement here is, "if you don't have a pot to p**s in".

  6. #79
    c8rbk1ng's Avatar
    c8rbk1ng is offline VIP, Satfix 2014 NFL Pool Week #5 & week # 15 Champion
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    7,865
    Satfix Buxs
    29,477
    Thanks
    1,733
    Thanked 4,089x in 1,142 Posts
    Items Crab
Gift received at 08-08-2015, 07:53 PM from gAsH
Message: I tried 15x in a row with different people and lost every time! :lol: 

Here is a gift for the crabby old man :tehe: You spelled your name wrong, should be Cr8bk1ng :PWireless AccessPopcornGuitar2JeepCamaroFootball

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dishuser View Post
    not in Florida
    Not in a lot of states but each state is different.

  7. #80
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    21
    Satfix Buxs
    86
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 9x in 7 Posts

    Default

    Thanks for your input guys at least now I have an idea of what to expect to look for in the coming days. I can't blame anyone except myself though. As the old saying goes "play with fire and you'r gonna get burned".

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Thunderbolt For This Useful Post:


  9. #81
    c8rbk1ng's Avatar
    c8rbk1ng is offline VIP, Satfix 2014 NFL Pool Week #5 & week # 15 Champion
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    7,865
    Satfix Buxs
    29,477
    Thanks
    1,733
    Thanked 4,089x in 1,142 Posts
    Items Crab
Gift received at 08-08-2015, 07:53 PM from gAsH
Message: I tried 15x in a row with different people and lost every time! :lol: 

Here is a gift for the crabby old man :tehe: You spelled your name wrong, should be Cr8bk1ng :PWireless AccessPopcornGuitar2JeepCamaroFootball

    Default

    Of course you have to own up to some of the blame but I blame the sellers and re-sellers who made their money over the years but wouldn't man up when the s**t hit the fan and threw their 'clients' under the bus. No one takes responsibility for their actions in today's society if they can get away with another course of action. They'll get away with a slap on the hand and all those 'clients' who receive letters will pay through the nose. Pay the $3500, you (generally not personally) probably watched that amount or more over the years so pay it and move on with life. The way I see it, there's only 2 options, pay the money or don't pay the money. The choice is up to the individual. JMHO

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to c8rbk1ng For This Useful Post:


  11. #82
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,365
    Satfix Buxs
    7,987
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 1,523x in 764 Posts

    Default

    Or negotiate to only pay a smaller amount. Most courts will require negotiation to get a settlement before they ever try to issue a ruling. So, offer a settlement for a small sum--I don't think anyone watches enough TV to justify $3500!
    Negotiation will work even better if EVERYONE that get a letter works together. Get good representation that can offer other ways to respond to the letters or emails before doing ANYTHING.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to jvvh5897 For This Useful Post:


  13. #83
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    7,046
    Satfix Buxs
    6,986
    Thanks
    2,850
    Thanked 8,196x in 2,659 Posts
    Items Whiskey
Gift received at 12-12-2013, 01:32 AM from swanner
Message: I think You Deserve this, 
Cheers Mate...
swannerCrown Royal
Gift received at 06-27-2013, 10:55 PM from Anubis
Message: If you're having some ryes I figure I'd contribute.Trophy 3
Gift received at 12-15-2012, 12:02 PM from ICEMAN

    Default

    the best advice is see a lawyer, pay the ransom demand , make sure all the paper work is in order and get on with your life.

    there is no way to find out who all got letters and try to mount some type of defense that way. Court documents are filed in different states and different districts within those states and there is no way of knowing who got a demand letter and who didn't anyway.

    Face it, the same as getting caught speeding. You tried to cheat the system and you lost. As for the cost of $3500, well a good solid sub will cost you $100 every month not counting PPVs and events. Add those in and $3500 is about the retail value of 2 years of programming. Whether you agree with that value is a moot point.

    Obviously some people are willing to pay those costs or the provider would not be selling it for that. In a sense anybody doing IKS agrees with the cost of a legit sub as well or they wouldn't be willing to pay less for an illegal service and at the same time risk the chance of getting caught and pay the full retail values as well.

    The solution to the letter is simple. WRITE A CHECK!

    Spoon Feeders FEED Bottom Feeders


  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Nostradamus For This Useful Post:


  15. #84
    c8rbk1ng's Avatar
    c8rbk1ng is offline VIP, Satfix 2014 NFL Pool Week #5 & week # 15 Champion
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    7,865
    Satfix Buxs
    29,477
    Thanks
    1,733
    Thanked 4,089x in 1,142 Posts
    Items Crab
Gift received at 08-08-2015, 07:53 PM from gAsH
Message: I tried 15x in a row with different people and lost every time! :lol: 

Here is a gift for the crabby old man :tehe: You spelled your name wrong, should be Cr8bk1ng :PWireless AccessPopcornGuitar2JeepCamaroFootball

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jvvh5897 View Post
    Or negotiate to only pay a smaller amount. Most courts will require negotiation to get a settlement before they ever try to issue a ruling. So, offer a settlement for a small sum--I don't think anyone watches enough TV to justify $3500!
    Negotiation will work even better if EVERYONE that get a letter works together. Get good representation that can offer other ways to respond to the letters or emails before doing ANYTHING.
    Do the math. If you had a legit sub with all the channels you get from IKS your cost per month would be in the $180 - $200 or more per month price range, and that doesn't include any PPV you may watch (WWE, MMA or PPV Movies). If you've had your service for about a year and a half there would be your $3500. If you've used IKS for more than that time you would have spent much much more with a legit sub.

  16. #85
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    641
    Satfix Buxs
    19,580
    Thanks
    449
    Thanked 557x in 268 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by c8rbk1ng View Post
    That's why the process server shows up at your door. The registered letter means nothing...and according to the new law, the email they sent you is proof that you were notified, I just went through this stuff with my son.


    Just reading this thread for the first thus my very late reply. What new law is there that says an email is proof that you were notified ? There are alternative serving options a court can grant but really don't think an email can be used a substitute service as some new law that now allows it as some new general blanket acceptable law across the board. Its up to the Court, state, and circumstance if they will accept email as service, rulings have gone both ways but more rule against it.


    The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure establish that individuals and corporations may be served “following state law for serving a summons . . . in the state where the district court is located." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1), (h)(1)(A). Thus, state rules determine how plaintiffs serve on defendants. When personal service of process cannot be accomplished, plaintiffs usually resort to alternate means to serve defendants as allowed by state law. For instance, under Michigan law, when service of process cannot be made as provided by the civil procedure rules, “the court may allow service of process to be made in any other manner reasonably calculated to give defendant actual notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard.” M.C.R. 2.105(I). This Michigan rule is common to most U.S. states.



    In McCluskey v. Belford High Sch., Case No. 2:09-14345, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan was to decide whether service of process through an e-mail was an alternate way to serve defendant according to M.C.R. 2.105(I). The court held that an e-mail was not an appropriate service of process under Michigan law.

    In McCluskey, plaintiffs alleged that defendants operated a fraudulent Internet scheme through various websites where they represented the existence of accredited and legitimate high schools, whose diplomas would be accepted by employers, professional associations, other schools, colleges and universities. Plaintiffs were adults who obtained diplomas through Defendant’s websites. Plaintiffs were unable to serve summons on defendants personally or by registered mail. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants listed addresses in Texas and California, but neither location had a physical office located there or an agent to accept service. Thus, plaintiffs filed a motion requesting the court to authorize service of process through (1) e-mail (they had some plaintiffs’ e-mail addresses); (2) by a posting at the county courthouse; and (3) by a posting on the Internet at “www.belfordlawsuit.com,” according to M.C.R. 2.105(I).



    The court held that plaintiffs’ proposed alternate forms of service were not reasonably calculated to give defendants actual notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard. Regarding the courthouse postings, the court held that there was no evidence that defendants had physical presence in Michigan as to infer that these postings would give actual notice to defendants. Regarding the Internet postings, the court held that “is unlikely to provide actual notice to Defendants of the proceedings because Defendants may not be aware of the existence of the website created by Plaintiffs.” Lastly, the plaintiffs failed to prove that the e-mail addresses obtained were likely to give actual notice of the proceedings to defendants.



    Unlike this Michigan district court, a New York district court in Snyder v. Energy Inc., 857 N.Y.S.2d 442 (2008), allowed service through e-mail. In Snyder, Defendant Corporation was not registered with the N.Y. secretary of State and the plaintiff was unable to find a place where the defendant corporation or its president could be physically served. Plaintiffs showed the court that they made reasonable effort to locate a current address to serve defendants to not avail. Yet, plaintiffs showed the court that they could reach the corporation’s president on the Internet. Plaintiffs had the president’s e-mail address and they sent an e-mail requesting a physical address to serve process, but their e-mails were unanswered. The court held that “[S]ervice by e-mail was reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise the corporation and the president of the action, and was an appropriate form of service.”



    According to the two above decisions, the granting of a request of service of process through e-mail may depend on the facts of each case and the state court to decide it. E-mail as an alternate way to serve summons is still incipient, and many years may passed before this becomes a common practice




    GS2

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •