Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: WANTED - Genuine Dreamlink T6 Internal Photos

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    46
    Satfix Buxs
    1,507,708
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 22x in 10 Posts
    Items PizzaTreasureTrophyWireless AccessFootballBirdCanadaDish

    Default WANTED - Genuine Dreamlink T6 Internal Photos

    Hey guys,

    I've been doing some experimenting with the Dreamlink T6 and I'm trying to narrow down the reason why the clone files will not accept the factory update files.

    Upon opening my cloned T6 I noticed that there are quite a few components missing.

    The board is a standard Amlogic dual core CPU board (G18ref) for anyone who is interested.

    Meaning, we should actually be able to start breathing some new life into these old receivers.

    However, I'm running into some limitations, and I believe it to be because the device is missing some of the components that the factory unit would have had.

    So, I'm turning to the community. If anyone has a NON-CLONE T6 they would be willing to take a photo of and post I could potentially narrow down the issues I've been having and hopefully provide a hardware fix which would in turn make our clone T6's genuine.

    So if anyone at all has a non-clone and would be interested in helping me develop a solution I would very much appreciate it. A photo of the internals would be a fantastic start.

    Thanks everybody

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    6,822
    Satfix Buxs
    2,291,253
    Thanks
    7,338
    Thanked 12,329x in 4,234 Posts
    Items Crown Royal
Gift received at 11-09-2019, 09:07 PM from Putski
Message: Have a couple drinks on me..Sword

    Default

    Worst mistake dreamlink owner ever made. He wouldnt even listen to the dreamlink team and pushed this ahead of the t1
    Sorry mine went to the electronics recycling depot after a month

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to nobodyspecial For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    46
    Satfix Buxs
    11,082
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 42x in 26 Posts

    Default

    I have one and will get it out tomorrow and take a picture on the main board. Haven't ever put a photo on here before so will have to figure that out.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to redbaron1 For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    runamok's Avatar
    runamok is offline Visiting Dignitary/NFL WEEK 16 & 18 CHAMP
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    35.2532° N, 82.1971° W
    Posts
    4,661
    Satfix Buxs
    1,430,309
    Thanks
    26,999
    Thanked 19,484x in 4,180 Posts
    Items beerWhiskeyA BeerSprint carFootballYing & yangTreeDoll

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron1 View Post
    I have one and will get it out tomorrow and take a picture on the main board. Haven't ever put a photo on here before so will have to figure that out.


    Download picture to computer and remember where it downloaded too.Then click reply then click on square icon above comment box that says insert image.Then click from computer then click browse and go to where picture is located then then click image then upload.

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    46
    Satfix Buxs
    1,507,708
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 22x in 10 Posts
    Items PizzaTreasureTrophyWireless AccessFootballBirdCanadaDish

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron1 View Post
    I have one and will get it out tomorrow and take a picture on the main board. Haven't ever put a photo on here before so will have to figure that out.
    That would be excellent.

    It looks like the clones are missing the main TSOP NAND chip which the G18REF boards all have. This makes sense why stock firmware images for the non-clone would fail and brick the device as it would attempt to install the build directly to the NAND (Which on the clones at least, doesn't seem to exist) causing the device to brick. And seeing as there is ZERO firmware images for the clones, other than the update packages which aren't actually firmware, just patches to the system, it all makes sense.

    Post the pictures when you can

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    46
    Satfix Buxs
    11,082
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 42x in 26 Posts

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to redbaron1 For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    46
    Satfix Buxs
    1,507,708
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 22x in 10 Posts
    Items PizzaTreasureTrophyWireless AccessFootballBirdCanadaDish

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron1 View Post
    Thank you!

  11. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    46
    Satfix Buxs
    1,507,708
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 22x in 10 Posts
    Items PizzaTreasureTrophyWireless AccessFootballBirdCanadaDish

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron1 View Post
    So, very interesting. Looks like they didn't use a TSOP chip in the non-clones either. Major differences I see are there are a few components missing from the clone that are on the original (As expected) but also some added components on the clone. Mainly an eeprom chip on the clone located above the processor by the display. You can see that is absent from your box.

    Also, the ram and memory chips are different which was anticipated.

    I really appreciate the photos redbaron1. Thank you!

  12. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    46
    Satfix Buxs
    11,082
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 42x in 26 Posts

    Default

    You are welcome.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •