DN $3500 demand

[bigbird]

Wow i thought you bought your codes trying to expose the server that you
bought codes from to claim the 25.000.00 dollar reward that satscams offered
for information leading to the exposure of the server.There is a lot of money
to be made in this field big banks and others pay big money for hackers to
expose security leaks.

Thats funny. Try and prove that in court.

bigbird

[sodusme]

Yes would be interesting to see how one goes. However if you receive a letter and it has the codes bought, user name for satfix, date bought, email address, name bought from might make you think a bit. Now put your user name in the search spot and see how many posts you have done. Now read what you posted. Now think again about your choices.

Well that is where I'm a little smarter then the average bear....

Now I'm not saying anything disparaging about anyone here but I can tell you that I may or may not have ran stand alone for years....and I would be willing to bet that no one on these sites except maybe a handful from staff on the site I mod at can tell me what I ran and for how long....if at all?

Whenever I posted any advice it was always 'third' party i.e. "I heard that to get the guide on XYZ receiver you can park it on ch. ABC for X amount of time." or "I believe I read where to set the clock on XYZ receiver you have to....". I never posted first hand knowledge about any receiver I may or may not have ran and I never posted about specific channels or events.

[fifties]

the case settled with Magi paying Dish an undisclosed sum.

Your reference, please?

[alex70olds]

Your reference, please?

STIPULATION FOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiffs DISH Network L.L.C., EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., and NagraStar LLC (collectively, “DISH Network”), and Defendant Kailas Magi respectfully notify the Court of the parties’ settlement of this action. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, DISH Network voluntarily dismisses this action against Defendant with prejudice. No costs are to be assessed to any party.

I just don't see where either side had to pay anything. Perhaps I am just missing it.

[CF-47]

Costs are 'COURT COSTS' not settelment amounts. Sometimes means that it was arbritrated out, as you pay the arbritrator (firm) for their services and both sides ask the court to dismss the case.

[fifties]

DISH Network voluntarily dismisses this action

When a lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice, the court is saying that it has made a final determination on the merits of the case, and that the plaintiff is therefore forbidden from filing another lawsuit based on the same grounds.

OK, so what we know is, DN dropped the case, and per the description of "with prejudice" from NOLO, agreed to never sue him again for this activity.

What we don't know, however, is, did it cost him anything (to satisfy the plaintiff's complaint)? Court costs don't factor in here; those are primarily legal fees (lawyer's time).

[alex70olds]

OK, so what we know is, DN dropped the case, and per the description of "with prejudice" from NOLO, agreed to never sue him again for this activity.

What we don't know, however, is, did it cost him anything (to satisfy the plaintiff's complaint)? Court costs don't factor in here; those are primarily legal fees (lawyer's time).

I dont know if he had to pay Dish to settle, it does not state that.

It also does not state there was an injunction of any kind.

It does not state there was a confidential settlement.

It is quite simple, the case was dismissed, it states that.

This is not typical of all the cases I posted. I had to read everyone of them to compile the list. This case does not follow typical protocol of any case handled by Chad and associates. It may be just wishful thinking, but it seems on the surface a victory.

Again it does not state it was a confidential settlement, so it would be interesting what Magi's attorney has to say. Heck, he could certainly drum up some business by coming here and expressing his opinion, outside of client attorney privilege.

[norm155]

Ok i got the info from gary ruff ..it looks like it can help out. for the ones that got the letter i would be happy to share it but if anyone is willing to help cover the cost of it i would appreciate that .

[1boxman]

OK, so what we know is, DN dropped the case, and per the description of "with prejudice" from NOLO, agreed to never sue him again for this activity.

What we don't know, however, is, did it cost him anything (to satisfy the plaintiff's complaint)? Court costs don't factor in here; those are primarily legal fees (lawyer's time).

Ya that is the kicker...the unknowning of why they really dropped the case ..I guess we can assume..but sure bring up alot of question ...did he have info ?? where they wrong ?and so on ..but what ever it is ..my guess they will not let anyone know to the fact . So know can do the same ..

[fifties]

Ok i got the info from gary ruff ..it looks like it can help out. for the ones that got the letter i would be happy to share it but if anyone is willing to help cover the cost of it i would appreciate that .

Is Gary Ruff the attorney that handled Magi's case? Did this cost you $ to find out? If it could be outed here in the open, it could throttle DN's legal bulldogs.

[yappapi]

this is gary ruff

hxxp://www.piratecardblues.com/

[yappapi]

this is magi's attorney

hxxp://www.corporationwiki.com/Texas/Gilmer/nelson-associates-attorneys-at-law-pc/108324713.aspx

[norm155]

I will post the info later of what i got from gary ruff

[Anubis]

I will post the info later of what i got from gary ruff

We await with baited breath.

[sodusme]

I will post the info later of what i got from gary ruff

Be very careful what you post....

Gary Ruff; all rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without the express permission of the author, except that “links” to the site are permitted. Contact author at 631.390.8338.

I'd hate to the site get in trouble or you yourself. This guy is an attorney so its probably best not to post that out in the open. He'll be all over that like a pitbull on a poodle if he finds out.

Just an FYI.