DN $3500 demand

**alex70olds** · 05-15-2013, 04:32 PM

Originally Posted by Grave Digger

i have read many of your posts and you have made many remarks that indicate you are a fairly wealthy individual, so i have to question why somebody who has a great job, and is apparently as wealthy as you are is using IKS in the first place? going by your remarks i draw the conclusion that you could easily afford a good sub account, so why bother taking the risk of IKS to begin with?

See Sod, we did not need DU to post it after all lol.

**1boxman** · 05-15-2013, 04:50 PM

Originally Posted by Grave Digger

i have read many of your posts and you have made many remarks that indicate you are a fairly wealthy individual, so i have to question why somebody who has a great job, and is apparently as wealthy as you are is using IKS in the first place? going by your remarks i draw the conclusion that you could easily afford a good sub account, so why bother taking the risk of IKS to begin with?

What does wealth have to do with it????some..that want to take a risk or see it as a hobby . The old days ..am sure there were many that could afford subs and did and do have them for back up . Some do have there own reasons for taking the risk .All choices

**norm155** · 05-15-2013, 05:48 PM

Originally Posted by sodusme

I think you know it can be beaten too but again your 'objective' is cost.

I noticed you didn't refute that assessment but rather switched gears again. That is an all too familiar tactic when someone doesn't want to admit the truth.

So lets ask again: Are there attorneys that WILL take this and you are not willing to shell out the money or are there NOT any attorneys willing to take this? Its a simple question norm?

What do you not understand..they are friends of the family and gave me there honest opinion..I am sure any other lawyer would say ya we will take the case ..but why pay when I was assured they could not see anyway to win!!!!

**jeldf** · 05-15-2013, 06:45 PM

Originally Posted by norm155

What do you not understand..they are friends of the family and gave me there honest opinion..I am sure any other lawyer would say ya we will take the case ..but why pay when I was assured they could not see anyway to win!!!!

OK norm....cut your loss and give up this thread......it's becoming your life! Move on.

**sodusme** · 05-15-2013, 06:50 PM

Originally Posted by norm155

What do you not understand..they are friends of the family and gave me there honest opinion..I am sure any other lawyer would say ya we will take the case ..but why pay when I was assured they could not see anyway to win!!!!

I think you are losing track of what posts to quote here. This post of mine you are quoting is from like 3 comments ago?....which you already commented on? Any special reason why you decided to revisit this one post of mine?

Since you didn't answer JCO I'd also like to know how you are able to 'post' again on an FTA site when your apology letter stipulates you will not engage in any piracy behavior again?

So a couple 'family friend lawyers' is indicative of ALL attorneys than? Or are there perhaps some attorneys that would probably take this? Apparently there ARE attorneys that will take this as I'm sure I saw some defense attorneys listed in all those cases Alex was kind enough to post. In fact a couple of them didn't do too shabby for their clients.

I'm just gonna come right out now and say this: Something doesn't smell right about your posting bro'. You are all over the board with the reasoning on why you didn't move forward and pursue this. First it was that the attorneys wouldn't take it. Than it was that the attorneys advised you there was no case. Than it was that you didn't wanna throw money at this. Than it was that maybe you could find an attorney but at what price. Than it was that you couldn't have judgments against you because of your job. Than there were a couple public announcements sprinkled in.

Very suspicious if you ask me. The only reason I even touched on this is because you won't leave this alone. I even issued you an apology....a PUBLIC f'ing apology....and STILL you persist. You are very dogged in your attempts to try to convince others that there is no case here and they are better off paying. Almost like a P.I would be....

**MarvinGardens** · 05-15-2013, 07:23 PM

To those who think there is a defense to this you do not have to wait until DN sues you to test the legality of their infringement action.

Without admitting any wrong doing anyone can sue DN for a "Declaratory Judgment" otherwise known as "Declaratory Relief".

So instead of badgering those who settled, now is your chance to prove that you really have the cahones to back up your preaching.

Otherwise you are just a narcissistic little pissant.

**waldo** · 05-15-2013, 07:25 PM

Originally Posted by JCO

If you settled arent you breaking the setlement by posting on an FTA site??

arent you 2

**sodusme** · 05-15-2013, 07:42 PM

Originally Posted by MarvinGardens

To those who think there is a defense to this you do not have to wait until DN sues you to test the legality of their infringement action.

Without admitting any wrong doing anyone can sue DN for a "Declaratory Judgment" otherwise known as "Declaratory Relief".

So instead of badgering those who settled, now is your chance to prove that you really have the cahones to back up your preaching.

Otherwise you are just a narcissistic little pissant.

Excuse me?

So what would you call your little antagonistic smart*ss comment there?

You moles make me laugh. Tell you what brother when you got the cahone's I got which loosely translated means to do what ever the hell I want to do on the internet and not have to look back....than you come talk to me. I've done things on here that would have you p*ssing in your pants afraid that the cops would be knocking on your door tomorrow. Don't talk to me about 'cahones'.

**Azul2** · 05-15-2013, 07:49 PM

Originally Posted by MarvinGardens

To those who think there is a defense to this you do not have to wait until DN sues you to test the legality of their infringement action.

Without admitting any wrong doing anyone can sue DN for a "Declaratory Judgment" otherwise known as "Declaratory Relief".

So instead of badgering those who settled, now is your chance to prove that you really have the cahones to back up your preaching.

Otherwise you are just a narcissistic little pissant.

Don't start the name calling. Not cool!!!!!!!!
A-2

**MarvinGardens** · 05-15-2013, 07:51 PM

I look forward to you representing yourself against DN in a Declaratory action.

**sodusme** · 05-15-2013, 07:59 PM

Originally Posted by MarvinGardens

I look forward to you representing yourself against DN in a Declaratory action.

Why would you look forward to that?

If anything you should probably be looking over your shoulder for me.

**MarvinGardens** · 05-15-2013, 08:05 PM

I am not going to lose any sleep LOL.

**Anubis** · 05-15-2013, 08:13 PM

Alrighty folks, let's keep it nice in the sandbox.

**sodusme** · 05-15-2013, 08:15 PM

Originally Posted by MarvinGardens

I am not going to lose any sleep LOL.

That's the right attitude....

So how long have you been a DN mole? Does it pay well? I'm only asking 'cause we have had this conversation before. You seem to know waaaaaaay more than the common man on this legal stuff and you apparently loath signal theft as you are always siding for the side of the 'law'....but yet you loiter on an FTA site?

Certainly makes a sole wonder? Quite curious if you ask me.